From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 25/27] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 16:03:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20180712140327.GA7810@gmail.com> References: <20180710222639.8241-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180710222639.8241-26-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180711102035.GB8574@gmail.com> <1531323638.13297.24.camel@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1531323638.13297.24.camel@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yu-cheng Yu Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek Peter List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org * Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c > > > index e2ee403865eb..ac2bc3a18427 100644 > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c > > > @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ enum x86_regset { > > >   REGSET_IOPERM64 = REGSET_XFP, > > >   REGSET_XSTATE, > > >   REGSET_TLS, > > > + REGSET_CET64 = REGSET_TLS, > > >   REGSET_IOPERM32, > > > + REGSET_CET32, > > >  }; > > Why does REGSET_CET64 alias on REGSET_TLS? > > In x86_64_regsets[], there is no [REGSET_TLS].  The core dump code > cannot handle holes in the array. Is there a fundamental (ABI) reason for that? > > to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"), > > not to CFE? > > > > I don't know if I can change that, will find out. So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference. Or something like that. Thanks, Ingo