From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/27] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce XSAVES system states Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 00:58:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20181017225829.GA32023@zn.tnic> References: <20181011151523.27101-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20181011151523.27101-4-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20181017104137.GE22535@zn.tnic> <32da559b-7958-60db-e328-f0eb316e668e@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32da559b-7958-60db-e328-f0eb316e668e@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Yu-cheng Yu , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 03:39:47PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Would you mind explaining this request? (requirement?) > Other than to say that it is the preference of some maintainers, > please say Why it is preferred. > > and since the s above won't typically be the same length, > it's not for variable name alignment, right? Searching the net a little, it shows you have asked that question before. So what is it you really wanna know? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.