From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add /proc/pid_gen Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:29:19 -0800 Message-ID: <20181121172919.1b6585e17770d0be7dd8c4d9@linux-foundation.org> References: <20181121201452.77173-1-dancol@google.com> <20181121205428.165205-1-dancol@google.com> <20181121141220.0e533c1dcb4792480efbf3ff@linux-foundation.org> <20181121145043.fa029f4f91afddc2a10bb81e@linux-foundation.org> <20181121162247.467fcab6c0aca0819a822286@linux-foundation.org> <20181121165741.ef089df784482632c4a66370@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Colascione Cc: linux-kernel , Linux API , Tim Murray , Primiano Tucci , Joel Fernandes , Jonathan Corbet , Mike Rapoport , Vlastimil Babka , Roman Gushchin , Prashant Dhamdhere , "Dennis Zhou (Facebook)" , "Eric W. Biederman" , rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, linux@dominikbrodowski.net, jpoimboe@redhat.com, Ard Biesheuvel , Michal Hocko , Stephen Rothwell , ktsanaktsidis@zendesk.com, David Howells , open list List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:08:08 -0800 Daniel Colascione wrote: > Have you done much > retrospective long trace analysis? No. Have you? Of course you have, which is why I and others are dependent upon you to explain why this change is worth adding to Linux. If this thing solves a problem which we expect will not occur for anyone between now and the heat death of the universe then this impacts our decisions. > The patch already describes the problem, the solution, and the way in > which this solution is provided. What more information do you want? I want to know how useful the darn thing is! Why is this so hard? And my thus-far-unanswered question regarding testing the feature is also relevant to that understanding. What does a testcase look like? If we're not actually able to construct one then what does that mean?