From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] selftests: add tests for pidfd_send_signal()
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:17:42 -0600
Message-ID: <20190108181742.GA22614@mail.hallyn.com>
References: <20190102161654.9093-1-christian@brauner.io>
 <20190102161654.9093-2-christian@brauner.io>
 <20190108175306.GF29009@cisco>
 <20190108175415.GA22353@mail.hallyn.com>
 <20190108175843.GA26016@cisco>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190108175843.GA26016@cisco>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>, Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, keescook@chromium.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com, oleg@redhat.com, cyphar@cyphar.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dancol@google.com, timmurray@google.com, fweimer@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:58:43AM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:54:15AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:53:06AM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 05:16:54PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > > +			/*
> > > > +			 * Stop the child so we can inspect whether we have
> > > > +			 * recycled pid PID_RECYCLE.
> > > > +			 */
> > > > +			close(pipe_fds[0]);
> > > > +			ret = kill(recycled_pid, SIGSTOP);
> > > > +			close(pipe_fds[1]);
> > > > +			if (ret) {
> > > > +				(void)wait_for_pid(recycled_pid);
> > > > +				_exit(PIDFD_ERROR);
> > > > +			}
> > > 
> > > Sorry for being late to the party, but I wonder if this whole thing
> > > couldn't be simplified with /proc/sys/kenrel/ns_last_pid?
> > 
> > no, bc it's not namespaced :)
> 
> Huh? It looks like it is...
> 
> static int pid_ns_ctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>                 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
> {
>         struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
>         struct ctl_table tmp = *table;
>         int ret, next;
> 
>         if (write && !ns_capable(pid_ns->user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>                 return -EPERM;
> 
>         ...

Oh - hah, but that's ns_last_pid.  You'd want pid_max.  And that one
is not namespaced.