From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:40:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20190313134022.GB5922@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20190208100554.32196-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20190208100554.32196-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190208100554.32196-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick Bellasi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , Paul Turner , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:05:40AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > +static inline unsigned int uclamp_bucket_id(unsigned int clamp_value) > +{ > + return clamp_value / UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA; > +} > + > +static inline unsigned int uclamp_bucket_value(unsigned int clamp_value) > +{ > + return UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA * uclamp_bucket_id(clamp_value); return clamp_value - (clamp_value % UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA); might generate better code; just a single division, instead of a div and mult. > +} > + > +static inline unsigned int uclamp_none(int clamp_id) > +{ > + if (clamp_id == UCLAMP_MIN) > + return 0; > + return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE; > +} > + > +static inline void uclamp_rq_update(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id) > +{ > + struct uclamp_bucket *bucket = rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket; > + unsigned int max_value = uclamp_none(clamp_id); > + unsigned int bucket_id; > + > + /* > + * Both min and max clamps are MAX aggregated, thus the topmost > + * bucket with some tasks defines the rq's clamp value. > + */ > + bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS; > + do { > + --bucket_id; > + if (!rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket[bucket_id].tasks) > + continue; > + max_value = bucket[bucket_id].value; > + break; If you flip the if condition the code will be nicer. > + } while (bucket_id); But you can also use a for loop: for (i = UCLAMP_BUCKETS-1; i>=0; i--) { if (rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket[i].tasks) { max_value = bucket[i].value; break; } } > + WRITE_ONCE(rq->uclamp[clamp_id].value, max_value); > +}