From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:22:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20190313172225.GG5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20190208100554.32196-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20190208100554.32196-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20190313134022.GB5922@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190313161229.pkib2tmjass5chtb@e110439-lin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190313161229.pkib2tmjass5chtb@e110439-lin> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick Bellasi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , Paul Turner , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 04:12:29PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > Yes, the for looks better, but perhaps like that: > > unsigned int bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS; > > /* > * Both min and max clamps are MAX aggregated, thus the topmost > * bucket with some tasks defines the rq's clamp value. > */ > for (; bucket_id >= 0; --bucket_id) { GCC will be clever and figure that unsigned will never be smaller than 0 and turn the above into an infinite loop or something daft. That is; use 'int', not 'unsigned int' for bucket_id.