From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: HWCAP: add support for AT_HWCAP2
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:58:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190402145831.GI3567@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190401104515.39775-3-andrew.murray@arm.com>
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Andrew Murray wrote:
> As we will exhaust the first 32 bits of AT_HWCAP let's start
> exposing AT_HWCAP2 to userspace to give us up to 64 caps.
>
> Whilst it's possible to use the remaining 32 bits of AT_HWCAP, we
> prefer to expand into AT_HWCAP2 in order to provide a consistent
> view to userspace between ILP32 and LP64. However internal to the
> kernel we prefer to continue to use the full space of elf_hwcap.
>
> To reduce complexity and allow for future expansion, we now
> represent hwcaps in the kernel as ordinals and use a
> KERNEL_HWCAP_ prefix. This allows us to support automatic feature
> based module loading for all our hwcaps.
>
> We introduce cpu_set_feature to set hwcaps which compliments the
Nit: maybe "complements"? (I've always been a bit fuzzy on the precise
distinction, though.)
> existing cpu_have_feature helper. These helpers allow us to clean
> up existing direct uses of elf_hwcap and reduce any future effort
> required to move beyond 64 caps.
>
> For convenience we also introduce cpu_{have,set}_named_feature which
> makes use of the cpu_feature macro to allow providing a hwcap name
> without a {KERNEL_}HWCAP_ prefix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-ccm-glue.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/crypto/aes-neonbs-glue.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/crypto/chacha-neon-glue.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c | 8 +--
> arch/arm64/crypto/nhpoly1305-neon-glue.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/crypto/sha256-glue.c | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 22 ++++----
> arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 66 ++++++++++++------------
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 4 +-
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 8 +++
> 14 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index e505e1fbd2b9..f06e1da1d678 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -14,15 +14,8 @@
> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>
> -/*
> - * In the arm64 world (as in the ARM world), elf_hwcap is used both internally
> - * in the kernel and for user space to keep track of which optional features
> - * are supported by the current system. So let's map feature 'x' to HWCAP_x.
> - * Note that HWCAP_x constants are bit fields so we need to take the log.
> - */
> -
> -#define MAX_CPU_FEATURES (8 * sizeof(elf_hwcap))
> -#define cpu_feature(x) ilog2(HWCAP_ ## x)
> +#define MAX_CPU_FEATURES 64
> +#define cpu_feature(x) (KERNEL_HWCAP_ ## x)
Nit: do we need the () here? They may be defensive, but I'm not sure
they're required.
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h
> index 400b80b49595..d21fe3314d90 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h
> @@ -39,12 +39,59 @@
> #define COMPAT_HWCAP2_SHA2 (1 << 3)
> #define COMPAT_HWCAP2_CRC32 (1 << 4)
>
> +/*
> + * For userspace we represent hwcaps as a collection of HWCAP{,2}_x bitfields
> + * as described in uapi/asm/hwcap.h. For the kernel we represent hwcaps as
> + * natural numbers (in a single range of size MAX_CPU_FEATURES) defined here
> + * with prefix KERNEL_HWCAP_ mapped to their HWCAP{,2}_x counterpart.
> + *
> + * Hwcaps should be set and tested within the kernel via the
> + * cpu_{set,have}_named_feature(feature) where feature is the unique suffix
> + * of KERNEL_HWCAP_{feature}.
> + */
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_FP ilog2(HWCAP_FP)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_ASIMD ilog2(HWCAP_ASIMD)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_EVTSTRM ilog2(HWCAP_EVTSTRM)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_AES ilog2(HWCAP_AES)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_PMULL ilog2(HWCAP_PMULL)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_SHA1 ilog2(HWCAP_SHA1)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_SHA2 ilog2(HWCAP_SHA2)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_CRC32 ilog2(HWCAP_CRC32)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_ATOMICS ilog2(HWCAP_ATOMICS)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_FPHP ilog2(HWCAP_FPHP)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_ASIMDHP ilog2(HWCAP_ASIMDHP)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_CPUID ilog2(HWCAP_CPUID)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_ASIMDRDM ilog2(HWCAP_ASIMDRDM)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_JSCVT ilog2(HWCAP_JSCVT)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_FCMA ilog2(HWCAP_FCMA)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_LRCPC ilog2(HWCAP_LRCPC)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_DCPOP ilog2(HWCAP_DCPOP)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_SHA3 ilog2(HWCAP_SHA3)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_SM3 ilog2(HWCAP_SM3)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_SM4 ilog2(HWCAP_SM4)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_ASIMDDP ilog2(HWCAP_ASIMDDP)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_SHA512 ilog2(HWCAP_SHA512)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE ilog2(HWCAP_SVE)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_ASIMDFHM ilog2(HWCAP_ASIMDFHM)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_DIT ilog2(HWCAP_DIT)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_USCAT ilog2(HWCAP_USCAT)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_ILRCPC ilog2(HWCAP_ILRCPC)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_FLAGM ilog2(HWCAP_FLAGM)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_SSBS ilog2(HWCAP_SSBS)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_SB ilog2(HWCAP_SB)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_PACA ilog2(HWCAP_PACA)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_PACG ilog2(HWCAP_PACG)
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_DCPODP (ilog2(HWCAP2_DCPODP) + 32)
Nit: can we wrap this so that the "+ 32" doesn't have to be spelled out
each time?
If we are splitting ths CVADP support from this patch, then dropping
such a wrapper macro here (maybe with a comment) will serve as a
placeholder for whichever patch wins the race for the first HWCAP2
flag.
Say
#define __khwcap2_feature(x) (ilog2(HWCAP2_ ## xx) + 32)
(Optionally, we could also have __khwcap_feature() too so that
everything looks nice and regular.)
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index aa4ec53281ce..6cc8aff83805 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -833,7 +833,11 @@ static void arch_timer_evtstrm_enable(int divider)
> cntkctl |= (divider << ARCH_TIMER_EVT_TRIGGER_SHIFT)
> | ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_EVT_EN;
> arch_timer_set_cntkctl(cntkctl);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> + cpu_set_named_feature(EVTSTRM);
> +#else
> elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_EVTSTRM;
> +#endif
I wonder whether we can have a generic definition for this:
#define cpu_set_named_feature(x) (elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_ ## x)
seems a reasonable fallback when the arch doesn't provide its own
version.
Although we don't have many instances, it would still be nice to avoid
ifdeffery creeping in.
[...]
We can probably pull the Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.txt changes into
this patch.
It probably makes sense to pull the Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.txt
updates alongside this patch in the series (or even incorporate them
into this patch, since they're not huge.)
Other than that, looks reasonable to me.
Cheers
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-01 10:45 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: Initial support for CVADP Andrew Murray
2019-04-01 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: Handle trapped DC CVADP Andrew Murray
2019-04-01 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: HWCAP: add support for AT_HWCAP2 Andrew Murray
2019-04-02 14:58 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2019-04-03 8:32 ` Andrew Murray
2019-04-03 9:11 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-03 9:29 ` Andrew Murray
2019-04-03 9:35 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-01 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: HWCAP: encapsulate elf_hwcap Andrew Murray
2019-04-02 14:58 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-02 15:06 ` Andrew Murray
2019-04-02 15:32 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-04-02 15:55 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-03 8:53 ` Andrew Murray
2019-04-03 9:13 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-01 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: Expose DC CVADP to userspace Andrew Murray
2019-04-01 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: add CVADP support to the cache maintenance helper Andrew Murray
2019-04-01 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: Advertise ARM64_HAS_DCPODP cpu feature Andrew Murray
2019-04-02 14:59 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-03 9:23 ` Andrew Murray
2019-04-03 9:32 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-03 9:57 ` Andrew Murray
2019-04-01 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: docs: document AT_HWCAP2 and unused AT_HWCAP bits Andrew Murray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190402145831.GI3567@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pb@pbcl.net \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).