From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Bellasi Subject: [PATCH v9 10/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with() Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 10:44:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20190515094459.10317-11-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> References: <20190515094459.10317-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190515094459.10317-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , Paul Turner , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org So far uclamp_util() allows to clamp a specified utilization considering the clamp values requested by RUNNABLE tasks in a CPU. For the Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS) it is interesting to test how clamp values will change when a task is becoming RUNNABLE on a given CPU. For example, EAS is interested in comparing the energy impact of different scheduling decisions and the clamp values can play a role on that. Add uclamp_util_with() which allows to clamp a given utilization by considering the possible impact on CPU clamp values of a specified task. Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra --- Changes in v9: Message-ID: <20190507103845.tejg55wfsu3l3jwh@e110439-lin> - moved here the definition of uclamp_eff_value() from a previous patch --- kernel/sched/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++ kernel/sched/sched.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index f0e04298b1d7..eed7664437ac 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -868,6 +868,19 @@ uclamp_eff_get(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id) return uc_req; } +unsigned int uclamp_eff_value(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id) +{ + struct uclamp_se uc_eff; + + /* Task currently refcounted: use back-annotated (effective) value */ + if (p->uclamp[clamp_id].active) + return p->uclamp[clamp_id].value; + + uc_eff = uclamp_eff_get(p, clamp_id); + + return uc_eff.value; +} + /* * When a task is enqueued on a rq, the clamp bucket currently defined by the * task's uclamp::bucket_id is refcounted on that rq. This also immediately diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 1ea44f4dec16..c95340a1d598 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -2276,11 +2276,20 @@ static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int flags) {} #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */ #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK -static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util) +unsigned int uclamp_eff_value(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id); + +static __always_inline +unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util, + struct task_struct *p) { unsigned int min_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value); unsigned int max_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value); + if (p) { + min_util = max(min_util, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN)); + max_util = max(max_util, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX)); + } + /* * Since CPU's {min,max}_util clamps are MAX aggregated considering * RUNNABLE tasks with _different_ clamps, we can end up with an @@ -2291,7 +2300,17 @@ static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util) return clamp(util, min_util, max_util); } + +static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util) +{ + return uclamp_util_with(rq, util, NULL); +} #else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ +static inline unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util, + struct task_struct *p) +{ + return util; +} static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util) { return util; -- 2.21.0