From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/12] lib: introduce copy_struct_{to,from}_user helpers Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:29:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20190905112958.ldzyzyuqn5akkhzy@wittgenstein> References: <20190904201933.10736-1-cyphar@cyphar.com> <20190904201933.10736-2-cyphar@cyphar.com> <20190905110544.d6c5t7rx25kvywmi@wittgenstein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Aleksa Sarai , Al Viro , Jeff Layton , "J. Bruce Fields" , Arnd Bergmann , David Howells , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Christian Brauner , Eric Biederman , Andy Lutomirski , Andrew Morton , Alexei Starovoitov , Kees Cook , Jann Horn , Tycho Andersen , David Drysdale , Chanho Min , Oleg Nesterov List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:17:38PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 05/09/2019 13.05, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 06:19:22AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > > >> + if (unlikely(!access_ok(dst, usize))) > >> + return -EFAULT; > >> + > >> + /* Deal with trailing bytes. */ > >> + if (usize < ksize) { > >> + if (memchr_inv(src + size, 0, rest)) > >> + return -EFBIG; > >> + } else if (usize > ksize) { > >> + if (__memzero_user(dst + size, rest)) > >> + return -EFAULT; > > > > Is zeroing that memory really our job? Seems to me we should just check > > it is zeroed. > > Of course it is, otherwise you'd require userspace to clear the output > buffer it gives us, which in the majority of cases is wasted work. It's > much easier to reason about if we just say "the kernel populates [uaddr, > uaddr + usize)". I don't really mind either way so sure. :)