From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND v5] x86/resctrl: Add task resctrl information
 display
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:53:55 +0000
Message-ID: <20200109145355.GC61542@chrisdown.name>
References: <20200109135001.10076-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200109135001.10076-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org

Chen Yu writes:
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_CPU_RESCTRL
>+	ONE("resctrl", S_IRUGO, proc_resctrl_show),

There was already some discussion about "resctrl" by itself being a misleading 
name, hence why the CONFIG option eventually became CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL. Can 
you please rethink the name of this /proc file, and have it at least be 
"cpu_resctrl" or "x86_resctrl" or similar? :-)