From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Serge Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@google.com>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
"David Rheinsberg" <david.rheinsberg@gmail.com>,
"Tom Gundersen" <teg@jklm.no>,
"Christian Kellner" <ckellner@redhat.com>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Stéphane Graber" <stgraber@ubuntu.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Steve Barber" <smbarber@google.com>,
"Dylan Reid" <dgreid@google.com>,
"Filipe Brandenburger" <filbranden@gmail.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Benjamin Elder" <bentheelder@google.com>,
"Akihiro Suda" <suda.kyoto@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] loopfs: start attaching correct namespace during loop_add()
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:36:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200423013639.GB2982@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422145437.176057-7-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 04:54:36PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Tag loop devices with the namespace the loopfs instance was mounted in.
> This has the consequence that loopfs devices carry the correct sysfs
> permissions for all their core files. All other devices files will
> continue to be correctly owned by the initial namespaces. Here is sample
> output:
>
> root@b1:~# mount -t loop loop /mnt
> root@b1:~# ln -sf /mnt/loop-control /dev/loop-control
> root@b1:~# losetup -f
> /dev/loop8
> root@b1:~# ln -sf /mnt/loop8 /dev/loop8
> root@b1:~# ls -al /sys/class/block/loop8
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Apr 7 13:06 /sys/class/block/loop8 -> ../../devices/virtual/block/loop8
> root@b1:~# ls -al /sys/class/block/loop8/
> total 0
> drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 0 Apr 7 13:06 .
> drwxr-xr-x 18 nobody nogroup 0 Apr 7 13:07 ..
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 alignment_offset
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nobody nogroup 0 Apr 7 13:07 bdi -> ../../bdi/7:8
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 capability
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 dev
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 discard_alignment
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 events
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 events_async
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 events_poll_msecs
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 ext_range
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 hidden
> drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nogroup 0 Apr 7 13:07 holders
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 inflight
> drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nogroup 0 Apr 7 13:07 integrity
> drwxr-xr-x 3 nobody nogroup 0 Apr 7 13:07 mq
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 7 13:06 power
> drwxr-xr-x 3 nobody nogroup 0 Apr 7 13:07 queue
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 range
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 removable
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 ro
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 size
> drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nogroup 0 Apr 7 13:07 slaves
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 stat
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nobody nogroup 0 Apr 7 13:07 subsystem -> ../../../../class/block
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 7 13:06 trace
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Apr 7 13:06 uevent
> root@b1:~#
>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
I was a *bit* worried about not taking a reference to the
user namespace, but it doesn't look like the chain of
loop_remove() -> del_gendisk() -> device_del() will allow any later
access through sysfs, so I guess it's fine.
Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
> ---
> /* v2 */
> unchanged
> - Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>:
> - Adapted commit message otherwise unchanged.
> ---
> drivers/block/loop.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 8e21d4b33e01..2dc53bad4b48 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -2212,6 +2212,10 @@ static int loop_add(struct loop_device **l, int i, struct inode *inode)
> disk->private_data = lo;
> disk->queue = lo->lo_queue;
> sprintf(disk->disk_name, "loop%d", i);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOPFS
> + if (loopfs_i_sb(inode))
> + disk->user_ns = loopfs_i_sb(inode)->s_user_ns;
> +#endif
>
> add_disk(disk);
>
> --
> 2.26.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-23 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 14:54 [PATCH v2 0/7] loopfs Christian Brauner
2020-04-22 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] kobject_uevent: remove unneeded netlink_ns check Christian Brauner
2020-04-22 16:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-04-22 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] loopfs: implement loopfs Christian Brauner
2020-04-22 21:52 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2020-04-23 11:24 ` Christian Brauner
2020-04-23 16:17 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2020-04-23 16:29 ` Christian Brauner
2020-04-22 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] loop: use ns_capable for some loop operations Christian Brauner
2020-04-22 20:50 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2020-04-22 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] kernfs: handle multiple namespace tags Christian Brauner
2020-04-22 22:01 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2020-04-22 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] loop: preserve sysfs backwards compatibility Christian Brauner
2020-04-23 1:17 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2020-04-23 11:15 ` Christian Brauner
2020-04-23 16:13 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2020-04-22 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] loopfs: start attaching correct namespace during loop_add() Christian Brauner
2020-04-23 1:36 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2020-04-22 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] loopfs: only show devices in their correct instance Christian Brauner
2020-04-23 1:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200423013639.GB2982@mail.hallyn.com \
--to=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bentheelder@google.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=ckellner@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.rheinsberg@gmail.com \
--cc=dgreid@google.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=filbranden@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=smbarber@google.com \
--cc=stgraber@ubuntu.com \
--cc=suda.kyoto@gmail.com \
--cc=teg@jklm.no \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).