From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF308C433E6 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A7723359 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726661AbhAMKE6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 05:04:58 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:37676 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726948AbhAMKE5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 05:04:57 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0b5c00b2d62b1c55c494d5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0b:5c00:b2d6:2b1c:55c4:94d5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 052ED1EC0373; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:04:16 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1610532256; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=6Q836lvEI8WL7BDS9FwTyp3jQYCAq9tax7h39eSviyg=; b=QGhyTjv+8jrsJmW04auJ2WzRUI8x3z3h3Nxe1Iofsa5h9SNwPhWVcm/kTr2VofD+ot0uEi bR8WMYNsVxyzR9uzfEztPrm+Wzta+YIiesKnMhkrnCnIz5NiIFbiNmce9zipmTdW9b6nvc PUt9/J0L3nIz3b7JgjwDsvnXLiuuciE= Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:04:16 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Yu, Yu-cheng" Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang , Pengfei Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 04/26] x86/cpufeatures: Introduce X86_FEATURE_CET and setup functions Message-ID: <20210113100416.GB16960@zn.tnic> References: <20201229213053.16395-5-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20210111230900.5916-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20210112123854.GE13086@zn.tnic> <0b144668-a989-6bc7-0b0d-2195d2d73397@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0b144668-a989-6bc7-0b0d-2195d2d73397@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:02:06PM -0800, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote: > Should I send an updated patch? Thanks! No, this is not how review works. Usually, you send your patchset, wait a week or two to gather feedback, incorporate that feedback or discuss/dispute it and you send your next version. You should know the process by now... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette