* Re: [PATCH 18/19] sched: prctl() core-scheduling interface [not found] ` <20210422123309.039845339@infradead.org> @ 2021-08-05 16:53 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov 2021-08-05 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Eugene Syromiatnikov @ 2021-08-05 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: joel, chris.hyser, joshdon, mingo, vincent.guittot, valentin.schneider, mgorman, linux-kernel, tglx, linux-api, ldv On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:05:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > API: > > prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_GET, tgtpid, pidtype, &cookie) > prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_CREATE, tgtpid, pidtype, NULL) > prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_TO, tgtpid, pidtype, NULL) > prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_FROM, srcpid, pidtype, NULL) > > where 'tgtpid/srcpid == 0' implies the current process and pidtype is > kernel enum pid_type {PIDTYPE_PID, PIDTYPE_TGID, PIDTYPE_PGID, ...}. It means that enum pid_tipe has to be a part of UAPI now. Would you like to address it, or rather I'd send a patch? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 18/19] sched: prctl() core-scheduling interface 2021-08-05 16:53 ` [PATCH 18/19] sched: prctl() core-scheduling interface Eugene Syromiatnikov @ 2021-08-05 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2021-08-05 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eugene Syromiatnikov Cc: joel, chris.hyser, joshdon, mingo, vincent.guittot, valentin.schneider, mgorman, linux-kernel, tglx, linux-api, ldv On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 06:53:19PM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:05:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > API: > > > > prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_GET, tgtpid, pidtype, &cookie) > > prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_CREATE, tgtpid, pidtype, NULL) > > prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_TO, tgtpid, pidtype, NULL) > > prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_FROM, srcpid, pidtype, NULL) > > > > where 'tgtpid/srcpid == 0' implies the current process and pidtype is > > kernel enum pid_type {PIDTYPE_PID, PIDTYPE_TGID, PIDTYPE_PGID, ...}. > > It means that enum pid_tipe has to be a part of UAPI now. Would you > like to address it, or rather I'd send a patch? Please send a patch; I'm more sparse than usual atm. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-05 17:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20210422120459.447350175@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <20210422123309.039845339@infradead.org>
2021-08-05 16:53 ` [PATCH 18/19] sched: prctl() core-scheduling interface Eugene Syromiatnikov
2021-08-05 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).