From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v1] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:37:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029083751.GR3891@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b884ad7d-48d3-fcc8-d199-9e7643552a9a@bytedance.com>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 02:12:28PM +0800, Gang Li wrote:
> On 10/28/21 11:30 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
> > That aside though, the configuration space could be better. It's possible
> > to selectively disable NUMA balance but not selectively enable because
> > prctl is disabled if global NUMA balancing is disabled. That could be
> > somewhat achieved by having a default value for mm->numa_balancing based on
> > whether the global numa balancing is disabled via command line or sysctl
> > and enabling the static branch if prctl is used with an informational
> > message. This is not the only potential solution but as it stands,
> > there are odd semantic corner cases. For example, explicit enabling
> > of NUMA balancing by prctl gets silently revoked if numa balancing is
> > disabled via sysctl and prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING,
> > 1) means nothing.
> >
> static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int
> queued)
> {
> ...
> if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_numa_balancing))
> task_tick_numa(rq, curr);
> ...
> }
>
> static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
> {
> ...
> if (!READ_ONCE(curr->mm->numa_balancing))
> return;
> ...
> }
>
> When global numa_balancing is disabled, mm->numa_balancing is useless.
I'm aware that this is the behaviour of the patch as-is.
> So I
> think prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING,0/1) should return
> error instead of modify mm->numa_balancing.
>
> Is it reasonable that prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING,PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING,0/1)
> can still change the value of mm->numa_balancing when global numa_balancing
> is disabled?
>
My point is that as it stands,
prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING,PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING,1) either does nothing or
fails. If per-process numa balancing is to be introduced, it should have
meaning with the global tuning affecting default behaviour and the prctl
affecting specific behaviour.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-29 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-27 13:26 [PATCH v1] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing Gang Li
2021-10-28 15:30 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-29 6:12 ` Gang Li
2021-10-29 8:37 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-11-09 8:28 ` 李港
2021-11-09 9:19 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-09 10:40 ` Gang Li
2021-11-09 12:12 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-09 13:58 ` Gang Li
2021-11-09 16:26 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-17 7:07 ` Gang Li
2021-11-17 8:29 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-17 9:38 ` Gang Li
2021-11-17 10:10 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-18 3:26 ` Gang Li
2021-11-18 8:58 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-18 9:49 ` Gang Li
2021-10-29 7:48 ` [External] " 李港
2021-11-22 7:34 ` Gang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211029083751.GR3891@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).