linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>,
	kcc@google.com, eranian@google.com, rppt@kernel.org,
	jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, dethoma@microsoft.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com,
	christina.schimpe@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 30/39] x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:51:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202212021848.B6277C86@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221203003606.6838-31-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 04:35:57PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> When operating with shadow stacks enabled, the kernel will automatically
> allocate shadow stacks for new threads, however in some cases userspace
> will need additional shadow stacks. The main example of this is the
> ucontext family of functions, which require userspace allocating and
> pivoting to userspace managed stacks.
> 
> Unlike most other user memory permissions, shadow stacks need to be
> provisioned with special data in order to be useful. They need to be setup
> with a restore token so that userspace can pivot to them via the RSTORSSP
> instruction. But, the security design of shadow stack's is that they
> should not be written to except in limited circumstances. This presents a
> problem for userspace, as to how userspace can provision this special
> data, without allowing for the shadow stack to be generally writable.
> 
> Previously, a new PROT_SHADOW_STACK was attempted, which could be
> mprotect()ed from RW permissions after the data was provisioned. This was
> found to not be secure enough, as other thread's could write to the
> shadow stack during the writable window.
> 
> The kernel can use a special instruction, WRUSS, to write directly to
> userspace shadow stacks. So the solution can be that memory can be mapped
> as shadow stack permissions from the beginning (never generally writable
> in userspace), and the kernel itself can write the restore token.
> 
> First, a new madvise() flag was explored, which could operate on the
> PROT_SHADOW_STACK memory. This had a couple downsides:
> 1. Extra checks were needed in mprotect() to prevent writable memory from
>    ever becoming PROT_SHADOW_STACK.
> 2. Extra checks/vma state were needed in the new madvise() to prevent
>    restore tokens being written into the middle of pre-used shadow stacks.
>    It is ideal to prevent restore tokens being added at arbitrary
>    locations, so the check was to make sure the shadow stack had never been
>    written to.
> 3. It stood out from the rest of the madvise flags, as more of direct
>    action than a hint at future desired behavior.
> 
> So rather than repurpose two existing syscalls (mmap, madvise) that don't
> quite fit, just implement a new map_shadow_stack syscall to allow
> userspace to map and setup new shadow stacks in one step. While ucontext
> is the primary motivator, userspace may have other unforeseen reasons to
> setup it's own shadow stacks using the WRSS instruction. Towards this
> provide a flag so that stacks can be optionally setup securely for the
> common case of ucontext without enabling WRSS. Or potentially have the
> kernel set up the shadow stack in some new way.
> 
> The following example demonstrates how to create a new shadow stack with
> map_shadow_stack:
> void *shstk = map_shadow_stack(addr, stack_size, SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN);
> 
> Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> v3:
>  - Change syscall common -> 64 (Kees)
>  - Use bit shift notation instead of 0x1 for uapi header (Kees)
>  - Call do_mmap() with MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE (Kees)
>  - Block unsupported flags (Kees)
>  - Require size >= 8 to set token (Kees)
> 
> v2:
>  - Change syscall to take address like mmap() for CRIU's usage
> 
> v1:
>  - New patch (replaces PROT_SHADOW_STACK).
> 
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl |  1 +
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h       |  3 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c                | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  include/linux/syscalls.h               |  1 +
>  include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h      |  2 +-
>  kernel/sys_ni.c                        |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
> index c84d12608cd2..f65c671ce3b1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
> @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@
>  448	common	process_mrelease	sys_process_mrelease
>  449	common	futex_waitv		sys_futex_waitv
>  450	common	set_mempolicy_home_node	sys_set_mempolicy_home_node
> +451	64	map_shadow_stack	sys_map_shadow_stack
>  
>  #
>  # Due to a historical design error, certain syscalls are numbered differently
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> index 775dbd3aff73..15c5a1c4fc29 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
>  		((key) & 0x8 ? VM_PKEY_BIT3 : 0))
>  #endif
>  
> +/* Flags for map_shadow_stack(2) */
> +#define SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN	(1ULL << 0)	/* Set up a restore token in the shadow stack */
> +
>  #include <asm-generic/mman.h>
>  
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_MMAN_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> index e53225a8d39e..8f329c22728a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/compat.h>
>  #include <linux/sizes.h>
>  #include <linux/user.h>
> +#include <linux/syscalls.h>
>  #include <asm/msr.h>
>  #include <asm/fpu/xstate.h>
>  #include <asm/fpu/types.h>
> @@ -71,19 +72,31 @@ static int create_rstor_token(unsigned long ssp, unsigned long *token_addr)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long alloc_shstk(unsigned long size)
> +static unsigned long alloc_shstk(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size,
> +				 unsigned long token_offset, bool set_res_tok)
>  {
>  	int flags = MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE;
>  	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> -	unsigned long addr, unused;
> +	unsigned long mapped_addr, unused;
>  
> -	mmap_write_lock(mm);
> -	addr = do_mmap(NULL, 0, size, PROT_READ, flags,
> -		       VM_SHADOW_STACK | VM_WRITE, 0, &unused, NULL);
> +	if (addr)
> +		flags |= MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE;
>  
> +	mmap_write_lock(mm);
> +	mapped_addr = do_mmap(NULL, addr, size, PROT_READ, flags,
> +			      VM_SHADOW_STACK | VM_WRITE, 0, &unused, NULL);
>  	mmap_write_unlock(mm);
>  
> -	return addr;
> +	if (!set_res_tok || IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))

Should this be IS_ERR_VALUE(mapped_addr) (i.e. the result of the
do_mmap)?

> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (create_rstor_token(mapped_addr + token_offset, NULL)) {
> +		vm_munmap(mapped_addr, size);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	return mapped_addr;
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned long adjust_shstk_size(unsigned long size)
> @@ -134,7 +147,7 @@ static int shstk_setup(void)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	size = adjust_shstk_size(0);
> -	addr = alloc_shstk(size);
> +	addr = alloc_shstk(0, size, 0, false);
>  	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
>  		return PTR_ERR((void *)addr);
>  
> @@ -179,7 +192,7 @@ int shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long clone_flags,
>  
>  
>  	size = adjust_shstk_size(stack_size);
> -	addr = alloc_shstk(size);
> +	addr = alloc_shstk(0, size, 0, false);
>  	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
>  		return PTR_ERR((void *)addr);
>  
> @@ -373,6 +386,33 @@ static int shstk_disable(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
> +{
> +	bool set_tok = flags & SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN;
> +	unsigned long aligned_size;
> +
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_USER_SHSTK))
> +		return -ENOSYS;

Using -ENOSYS means there's no way to tell the difference between
"kernel doesn't support it" and "CPU doesn't support it". Should this,
perhaps return -ENOTSUP?

> +
> +	if (flags & ~SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* If there isn't space for a token */
> +	if (set_tok && size < 8)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * An overflow would result in attempting to write the restore token
> +	 * to the wrong location. Not catastrophic, but just return the right
> +	 * error code and block it.
> +	 */
> +	aligned_size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> +	if (aligned_size < size)
> +		return -EOVERFLOW;
> +
> +	return alloc_shstk(addr, aligned_size, size, set_tok);
> +}
> +
>  long shstk_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int option, unsigned long features)
>  {
>  	if (option == ARCH_SHSTK_LOCK) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h
> index 33a0ee3bcb2e..392dc11e3556 100644
> --- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
> +++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
> @@ -1058,6 +1058,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_memfd_secret(unsigned int flags);
>  asmlinkage long sys_set_mempolicy_home_node(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
>  					    unsigned long home_node,
>  					    unsigned long flags);
> +asmlinkage long sys_map_shadow_stack(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, unsigned int flags);
>  
>  /*
>   * Architecture-specific system calls
> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> index 45fa180cc56a..b12940ec5926 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_futex_waitv, sys_futex_waitv)
>  __SYSCALL(__NR_set_mempolicy_home_node, sys_set_mempolicy_home_node)
>  
>  #undef __NR_syscalls
> -#define __NR_syscalls 451
> +#define __NR_syscalls 452
>  
>  /*
>   * 32 bit systems traditionally used different
> diff --git a/kernel/sys_ni.c b/kernel/sys_ni.c
> index 860b2dcf3ac4..cb9aebd34646 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys_ni.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys_ni.c
> @@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ COND_SYSCALL(vm86old);
>  COND_SYSCALL(modify_ldt);
>  COND_SYSCALL(vm86);
>  COND_SYSCALL(kexec_file_load);
> +COND_SYSCALL(map_shadow_stack);
>  
>  /* s390 */
>  COND_SYSCALL(s390_pci_mmio_read);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Otherwise, looks good!

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-03  2:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-03  0:35 [PATCH v4 00/39] Shadow stacks for userspace Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 01/39] Documentation/x86: Add CET shadow stack description Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:20   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  8:58   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-12-05 21:20     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 02/39] x86/shstk: Add Kconfig option for Shadow Stack Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:20   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 03/39] x86/cpufeatures: Add CPU feature flags for shadow stacks Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:22   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-07 11:00   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-07 22:35     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-08 11:10       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 04/39] x86/cpufeatures: Enable CET CR4 bit for shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:23   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-07 12:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-07 18:35     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 05/39] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce CET MSR and XSAVES supervisor states Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:24   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-20 11:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-21  0:45     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 06/39] x86/fpu: Add helper for modifying xstate Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:25   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-20 12:04   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-21  0:03     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-21 10:31       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 07/39] x86: Add user control-protection fault handler Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:28   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-20 16:19   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-21  0:37     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-21 10:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-21 21:42         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-01-04 12:50           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-20 21:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-21  0:38     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 08/39] x86/mm: Remove _PAGE_DIRTY from kernel RO pages Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:29   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-20 19:11   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 09/39] x86/mm: Move pmd_write(), pud_write() up in the file Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 10/39] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_COW Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:31   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-20 21:29   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-21  0:45     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 11/39] x86/mm: Update pte_modify for _PAGE_COW Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:31   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-27 11:42   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-27 23:31     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-01-04 13:25       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-05  1:06         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 12/39] x86/mm: Update ptep_set_wrprotect() and pmdp_set_wrprotect() for transition from _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_COW Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:32   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-27 13:26   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-27 22:26     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-01-04 13:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 13/39] x86/mm: Start actually marking _PAGE_COW Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:33   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 14/39] mm: Move VM_UFFD_MINOR_BIT from 37 to 38 Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 15/39] mm: Introduce VM_SHADOW_STACK for shadow stack memory Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:34   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 16/39] x86/mm: Check Shadow Stack page fault errors Rick Edgecombe
2023-01-04 14:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-05  1:29     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 17/39] x86/mm: Update maybe_mkwrite() for shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:34   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 18/39] mm: Fixup places that call pte_mkwrite() directly Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:37   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 19/39] mm: Add guard pages around a shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 20/39] mm/mmap: Add shadow stack pages to memory accounting Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:38   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 21/39] mm/mprotect: Exclude shadow stack from preserve_write Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:38   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 22/39] mm: Re-introduce vm_flags to do_mmap() Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 23/39] mm: Don't allow write GUPs to shadow stack memory Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:39   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 24/39] mm: Warn on shadow stack memory in wrong vma Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:40   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 25/39] x86: Introduce userspace API for shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:42   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 26/39] x86/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack support Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:43   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 27/39] x86/shstk: Handle thread shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:44   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 28/39] x86/shstk: Introduce routines modifying shstk Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:45   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 29/39] x86/shstk: Handle signals for shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:46   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 30/39] x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:51   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-12-05 22:19     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 31/39] x86/shstk: Support wrss for userspace Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:52   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 32/39] x86: Expose thread features in /proc/$PID/status Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:52   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:36 ` [PATCH v4 33/39] x86: Prevent 32 bit operations for 64 bit shstk tasks Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03 22:49   ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-12-04 20:51     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-15  0:25       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-03  0:36 ` [PATCH v4 34/39] x86/shstk: Wire in shadow stack interface Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  0:36 ` [PATCH v4 35/39] selftests/x86: Add shadow stack test Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  0:36 ` [PATCH v4 36/39] x86/fpu: Add helper for initing features Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  0:36 ` [PATCH v4 37/39] x86: Add PTRACE interface for shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:55   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-09 17:04   ` Mike Rapoport
2022-12-09 17:08     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-12-03  0:36 ` [PATCH v4 38/39] x86/shstk: Add ARCH_SHSTK_UNLOCK Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:56   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-03  0:36 ` [PATCH v4 39/39] x86/shstk: Add ARCH_SHSTK_STATUS Rick Edgecombe
2022-12-03  2:57   ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202212021848.B6277C86@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=christina.schimpe@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dethoma@microsoft.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=esyr@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=john.allen@amd.com \
    --cc=kcc@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).