From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] fanotify: support reporting non-decodeable file handles
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:48:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230427114849.cv3kzxk7rvxpohjc@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425130105.2606684-5-amir73il@gmail.com>
On Tue 25-04-23 16:01:05, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> fanotify users do not always need to decode the file handles reported
> with FAN_REPORT_FID.
>
> Relax the restriction that filesystem needs to support NFS export and
> allow reporting file handles from filesystems that only support ecoding
> unique file handles.
>
> For such filesystems, users will have to use the AT_HANDLE_FID of
> name_to_handle_at(2) if they want to compare the object in path to the
> object fid reported in an event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
...
> diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> index 8f430bfad487..a5af84cbb30d 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> @@ -1586,11 +1586,9 @@ static int fanotify_test_fid(struct dentry *dentry)
> * We need to make sure that the file system supports at least
> * encoding a file handle so user can use name_to_handle_at() to
> * compare fid returned with event to the file handle of watched
> - * objects. However, name_to_handle_at() requires that the
> - * filesystem also supports decoding file handles.
> + * objects, but it does not need to support decoding file handles.
> */
> - if (!dentry->d_sb->s_export_op ||
> - !dentry->d_sb->s_export_op->fh_to_dentry)
> + if (!dentry->d_sb->s_export_op)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
So AFAICS the only thing you require is that s_export_op is set to
*something* as exportfs_encode_inode_fh() can deal with NULL ->encode_fh
just fine without any filesystem cooperation. What is the reasoning behind
the dentry->d_sb->s_export_op check? Is there an implicit expectation that
if s_export_op is set to something, the filesystem has sensible
i_generation? Or is it just a caution that you don't want the functionality
to be enabled for unexpected filesystems? In either case it would be good
to capture the reasoning either in a comment or the changelog...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-27 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 13:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Prepare for supporting more filesystems with fanotify Amir Goldstein
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] exportfs: change connectable argument to bit flags Amir Goldstein
2023-04-26 14:16 ` Chuck Lever
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] exportfs: add explicit flag to request non-decodeable file handles Amir Goldstein
2023-04-26 14:18 ` Chuck Lever
2023-04-27 15:00 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27 15:13 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] exportfs: allow exporting non-decodeable file handles to userspace Amir Goldstein
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] fanotify: support reporting non-decodeable file handles Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 11:48 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-04-27 12:28 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 14:34 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 16:34 ` Jan Kara
2023-04-26 13:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Prepare for supporting more filesystems with fanotify Chuck Lever
2023-04-27 4:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 15:13 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27 15:52 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 16:36 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27 19:11 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 19:26 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-28 11:40 ` Jan Kara
2023-04-28 12:15 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-28 12:31 ` Jan Kara
2023-04-28 12:33 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-29 14:45 ` Chuck Lever
2023-04-29 17:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-05-01 18:48 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230427114849.cv3kzxk7rvxpohjc@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).