linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] fanotify: support reporting non-decodeable file handles
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:48:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230427114849.cv3kzxk7rvxpohjc@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425130105.2606684-5-amir73il@gmail.com>

On Tue 25-04-23 16:01:05, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> fanotify users do not always need to decode the file handles reported
> with FAN_REPORT_FID.
> 
> Relax the restriction that filesystem needs to support NFS export and
> allow reporting file handles from filesystems that only support ecoding
> unique file handles.
> 
> For such filesystems, users will have to use the AT_HANDLE_FID of
> name_to_handle_at(2) if they want to compare the object in path to the
> object fid reported in an event.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
...
> diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> index 8f430bfad487..a5af84cbb30d 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> @@ -1586,11 +1586,9 @@ static int fanotify_test_fid(struct dentry *dentry)
>  	 * We need to make sure that the file system supports at least
>  	 * encoding a file handle so user can use name_to_handle_at() to
>  	 * compare fid returned with event to the file handle of watched
> -	 * objects. However, name_to_handle_at() requires that the
> -	 * filesystem also supports decoding file handles.
> +	 * objects, but it does not need to support decoding file handles.
>  	 */
> -	if (!dentry->d_sb->s_export_op ||
> -	    !dentry->d_sb->s_export_op->fh_to_dentry)
> +	if (!dentry->d_sb->s_export_op)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

So AFAICS the only thing you require is that s_export_op is set to
*something* as exportfs_encode_inode_fh() can deal with NULL ->encode_fh
just fine without any filesystem cooperation. What is the reasoning behind
the dentry->d_sb->s_export_op check? Is there an implicit expectation that
if s_export_op is set to something, the filesystem has sensible
i_generation? Or is it just a caution that you don't want the functionality
to be enabled for unexpected filesystems? In either case it would be good
to capture the reasoning either in a comment or the changelog...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-27 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-25 13:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Prepare for supporting more filesystems with fanotify Amir Goldstein
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] exportfs: change connectable argument to bit flags Amir Goldstein
2023-04-26 14:16   ` Chuck Lever
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] exportfs: add explicit flag to request non-decodeable file handles Amir Goldstein
2023-04-26 14:18   ` Chuck Lever
2023-04-27 15:00   ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27 15:13     ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] exportfs: allow exporting non-decodeable file handles to userspace Amir Goldstein
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] fanotify: support reporting non-decodeable file handles Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 11:48   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-04-27 12:28     ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 14:34       ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 16:34       ` Jan Kara
2023-04-26 13:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Prepare for supporting more filesystems with fanotify Chuck Lever
2023-04-27  4:57   ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 15:13 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27 15:52   ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 16:36     ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27 19:11       ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 19:26         ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-28 11:40         ` Jan Kara
2023-04-28 12:15           ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-28 12:31             ` Jan Kara
2023-04-28 12:33             ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-29 14:45   ` Chuck Lever
2023-04-29 17:26     ` Amir Goldstein
2023-05-01 18:48       ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230427114849.cv3kzxk7rvxpohjc@quack3 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).