From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] listmount: small changes in semantics
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:03:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231128160337.29094-4-mszeredi@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231128160337.29094-1-mszeredi@redhat.com>
1) Make permission checking consistent with statmount(2): fail if mount is
unreachable from current root. Previously it failed if mount was
unreachable from root->mnt->mnt_root.
2) List all submounts, even if unreachable from current root. This is
safe, since 1) will prevent listing unreachable mounts for unprivileged
users.
3) LSMT_ROOT is unchaged, it lists mounts under current root.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
---
fs/namespace.c | 39 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index ad62cf7ee334..10cd651175b5 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -5004,37 +5004,26 @@ static struct mount *listmnt_next(struct mount *curr)
return node_to_mount(rb_next(&curr->mnt_node));
}
-static ssize_t do_listmount(struct mount *first, struct vfsmount *mnt,
+static ssize_t do_listmount(struct mount *first, struct path *orig, u64 mnt_id,
u64 __user *buf, size_t bufsize,
const struct path *root)
{
- struct mount *r, *m = real_mount(mnt);
- struct path rootmnt = {
- .mnt = root->mnt,
- .dentry = root->mnt->mnt_root
- };
- struct path orig;
+ struct mount *r;
ssize_t ctr;
int err;
- if (!is_path_reachable(m, mnt->mnt_root, &rootmnt))
- return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ? 0 : -EPERM;
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) &&
+ !is_path_reachable(real_mount(orig->mnt), orig->dentry, root))
+ return -EPERM;
- err = security_sb_statfs(mnt->mnt_root);
+ err = security_sb_statfs(orig->dentry);
if (err)
return err;
- if (root->mnt == mnt) {
- orig = *root;
- } else {
- orig.mnt = mnt;
- orig.dentry = mnt->mnt_root;
- }
-
for (ctr = 0, r = first; r; r = listmnt_next(r)) {
- if (r == m)
+ if (r->mnt_id_unique == mnt_id)
continue;
- if (!is_path_reachable(r, r->mnt.mnt_root, &orig))
+ if (!is_path_reachable(r, r->mnt.mnt_root, orig))
continue;
if (ctr >= bufsize)
@@ -5053,9 +5042,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(listmount, const struct mnt_id_req __user *, req,
{
struct mnt_namespace *ns = current->nsproxy->mnt_ns;
struct mnt_id_req kreq;
- struct vfsmount *mnt;
struct mount *first;
- struct path root;
+ struct path root, orig;
u64 mnt_id;
ssize_t ret;
@@ -5071,16 +5059,17 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(listmount, const struct mnt_id_req __user *, req,
down_read(&namespace_sem);
get_fs_root(current->fs, &root);
if (mnt_id == LSMT_ROOT) {
- mnt = root.mnt;
+ orig = root;
} else {
ret = -ENOENT;
- mnt = lookup_mnt_in_ns(mnt_id, ns);
- if (!mnt)
+ orig.mnt = lookup_mnt_in_ns(mnt_id, ns);
+ if (!orig.mnt)
goto err;
+ orig.dentry = orig.mnt->mnt_root;
}
first = node_to_mount(rb_first(&ns->mounts));
- ret = do_listmount(first, mnt, buf, bufsize, &root);
+ ret = do_listmount(first, &orig, mnt_id, buf, bufsize, &root);
err:
path_put(&root);
up_read(&namespace_sem);
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-28 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-28 16:03 [PATCH 0/4] listmount changes Miklos Szeredi
2023-11-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] listmount: rip out flags Miklos Szeredi
2023-11-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] listmount: list mounts in ID order Miklos Szeredi
2023-11-28 16:03 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2023-12-06 19:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] listmount: small changes in semantics Serge E. Hallyn
2023-12-06 20:24 ` Miklos Szeredi
2023-12-08 13:07 ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] listmount: allow continuing Miklos Szeredi
2023-11-29 9:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] listmount changes Christian Brauner
2023-11-29 10:22 ` Miklos Szeredi
2023-11-29 10:40 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231128160337.29094-4-mszeredi@redhat.com \
--to=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).