From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Tycho Andersen <tandersen@netflix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pidfd: getfd should always report ESRCH if a task is exiting
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:28:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240207102849.GA6627@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240207-beseitigen-ausfliegen-b2b95de67c4f@brauner>
On 02/07, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 08:25:54PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 02/06, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 07:06:07PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > > Or we can check task->files != NULL rather than PF_EXITING.
> > > >
> > > > To me this looks even better, but looks more confusing without a comment.
> > > > OTOH, imo this needs a comment anyway ;)
> > >
> > > I thought about this, but I didn't really understand the null check in
> > > exit_files();
> >
> > I guess task->files can be NULL at least if it was cloned with
> > kernel_clone_args->no_files == T
>
> Won't this give false positives for vhost workers which do set
> ->no_files but are user workers? IOW, return -ESRCH even though -EBADF
> would be correct in this scenario?
OK, agreed. Lets check PF_EXITING or exit_state.
Oleg.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 16:43 [PATCH] pidfd: getfd should always report ESRCH if a task is exiting Tycho Andersen
2024-02-06 17:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-06 17:55 ` Tycho Andersen
2024-02-06 18:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-06 18:09 ` Tycho Andersen
2024-02-06 19:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-06 19:35 ` Tycho Andersen
2024-02-07 9:11 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-07 10:28 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240207102849.GA6627@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tandersen@netflix.com \
--cc=tycho@tycho.pizza \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).