From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16F0F7E789 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 16:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707408836; cv=none; b=BdQxvNa9H7es1G7Nb8K8AMqGQbbS87MZZzZ+AMH6FzoEAVMJmmVDHpQUYTVH28rPQsJmEEOt7FvAnwyrhzjjCxTWby9Zpb4WVLFX0z3ukQn887u8yDdpJnUrW95zuKOlxp26xi1pl6QRVHcHtlKIjxANe8Bu4qTv5N/nfqwvJfg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707408836; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fGN+8yem8iK2xAq/g74215xfHKUUWP3ssmQdsWN6nkk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UleRCqY7oakD5ytFOnLQPZOsWFcTsDAJINVnhtQ8xwBoF8C7aMIpYXwPUSn4HNSwfgEXoJrkp3Tl224FuvE2a4tCBAx+ozSXu/ecOEQniMaTJtaRKfM7npAoLwEye/W9QyYu9ZuYnxoTb6A3ZsLuu3TWnhpVwFgrViViOIpGszI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=aYhpzvCx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="aYhpzvCx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1707408831; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fGN+8yem8iK2xAq/g74215xfHKUUWP3ssmQdsWN6nkk=; b=aYhpzvCx9gY3ddYvDS9d87b55402y+LlxAr4ABbox74Jwivl4K7sO6G5nlyfSmgoTotZTc xZVIMuBiPD1w0H+ptY6YwfLJmQ9Ku2pD1WHlaKeI8aOeDvzGcSmLRj5gj7GnOTP0heQ5nf FuBLAuDtCI+G8LSj79RyftmeDs3TrIs= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-441-lBOwh8qBM6KbU3EH3hgsWQ-1; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 11:13:02 -0500 X-MC-Unique: lBOwh8qBM6KbU3EH3hgsWQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 155803C28653; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 16:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.224.158]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 71A841C14B0E; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 16:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:11:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:11:19 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Christian Brauner Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "Eric W. Biederman" , Tycho Andersen , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pidfd: change pidfd_send_signal() to respect PIDFD_THREAD Message-ID: <20240208161118.GI19801@redhat.com> References: <20240207114549.GA12697@redhat.com> <20240208-fragt-prospekt-7866333b15f0@brauner> <20240208135344.GD19801@redhat.com> <20240208143407.GF19801@redhat.com> <20240208-klopapier-aushebeln-446ac80a6e9b@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240208-klopapier-aushebeln-446ac80a6e9b@brauner> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 On 02/08, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > Is prepare_kill_siginfo() correct when we send a signal to the child > > pid namespace? si_pid = task_tgid_vnr(current) doesn't look right in > > this case but perhaps I am totally confused. > > > > And why do we need it at all? Can't sys_kill() and pidfd_send_signal() > > just use SEND_SIG_NOINFO? > > Yeah, good point. I don't remember as it's been quite a while ago. My > guess is that it just tried to mirror kill() itself without being aware > of SEND_SIG_NOINFO. If you don't find anything wrong with this then > switch it to SEND_SIG_NOINFO in a preparatory patch we can backport, > please. Yes, but I still feel I must have missed something. Will read this code tomorrow. And another note for the record before I forget this. We can probably improve and rename access_pidfd_pidns(). Currently it is only used by pidfd_send_signal() but pidns_install() looks like another user. Oleg.