From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08A2374E10 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707494288; cv=none; b=iiZ01etEnQgMCpjU2hkJC+XjSTmeqxe+yAEmAagDhlR53HLP14feMUD+LNTHp+t9AiLGZxGnehuxXT4rTIm9K98YW9EXdtrqHnpKEWt7RUqj5nJmcUt/y5DDb1khZcOnFbsVovekTYC5YXBz50Zui7HKKWtdxKfabbqL+JI3k6U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707494288; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9liaOJHkXmgoMLq2BOqbcJsWNZ7++m9AMPpRUz4DQBU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=H8qwJiF+59sb/ISV3jXyKJqq5U9W8lg4q62VCHbBAQuuCa8306stevZeLYVWkaBRe4Geje/mmvDDUIO3narHOMu80ksI3w89YejBB/cgduJ5VHhDXG6py9dvx27XBX0teiW9k6HO1U3mR+0usZDgBcAonUbi7gtSfwApJ0pLGqc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=fGsSJxPS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="fGsSJxPS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1707494285; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9liaOJHkXmgoMLq2BOqbcJsWNZ7++m9AMPpRUz4DQBU=; b=fGsSJxPSMfL0lldyn+AeAdBg8YJm6gt1SL0H8CrwqbeXYnPDOyF+nXgLm1mB+O1uo6YFKf RHLwPrNZ1HdBFYYCWjEdmJ4tEPfE1weWpoLUpnDnILnEXBrKuZ1sGUAPkIwMFy+yJYI/LV Sy/YtkNDxAqOKeFd9Bhnfe4pk1yoFLM= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-350-xcCQgqAgMLaBubu3R9dYCQ-1; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 10:58:04 -0500 X-MC-Unique: xcCQgqAgMLaBubu3R9dYCQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0544B185A780; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.226.84]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 58FA840C9444; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:56:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:56:45 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Christian Brauner Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "Eric W. Biederman" , Tycho Andersen , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pidfd: change pidfd_send_signal() to respect PIDFD_THREAD Message-ID: <20240209155644.GD3282@redhat.com> References: <20240209130620.GA8039@redhat.com> <20240209130650.GA8048@redhat.com> <20240209-stangen-feuerzeug-17c8662854c9@brauner> <20240209154305.GC3282@redhat.com> <20240209-radeln-untrennbar-9d4ae05aa4cc@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240209-radeln-untrennbar-9d4ae05aa4cc@brauner> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.2 On 02/09, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 04:43:05PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > So the question: do you think we also want PIDFD_SIGNAL_SESSION_GROUP? > > Thought about this as well and my feeling is to wait until someone asks > for it. Right now, we have a reason to add PIDFD_SIGNAL_PROCESS_GROUP > because of Andy's use-case. If someone has a use-case for session groups > then yes. Otherwise I'd just not bother? OK, agreed. and I forgot to mention, if you want to add PIDFD_SIGNAL_PRGP you can look at __kill_pgrp_info(). Oleg.