From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A6291B95B; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712902572; cv=none; b=LHl4P8lMaaiz2j2yQxB8Ut97QxnOm7379D8/menHIKB+gPLTJNsHgUvnRiLCnyiHqo43lXblTDQiyhySQI50dqU9ZSU0wTv7lVF1fzcfqyaymXN/rz22ShcTaG0czDK07hLXCaB3G03GlCtNuxgGTC0xsLPc4eamuRFfbe2DY60= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712902572; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9eQMxiafHll+DiH3/C8+rB0CEgq99HCS6lNIP6dzKx4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rD1nRgfDAJazd0ZnqUNUhoyLGbfEE4WFEq529GgTBz1S/PeQ6J6kqIutanoX4gUWWKazAF0s1tVc52tUgu2MIIA4cfi+rKgqClHPTJuh4UgTs0uPcSL9qCVlBgqSRLS1zdHc/rkL5lV0x45+m+sLYS0Pu/PJ73Q21DdLx9ixg8c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=QvuJDJQY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="QvuJDJQY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C990C2BBFC; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:16:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1712902571; bh=9eQMxiafHll+DiH3/C8+rB0CEgq99HCS6lNIP6dzKx4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QvuJDJQY8WGntppmdP4fgc8Qvksv1g81oIXeT5FLOXWg5hmN8h6pR7cGEKeqYxKIo lLP4mIs4WGguK6Huha4l0KITsm+NsODwMqAhgJ5HqPzVW5gbu6IgxfpBRjeqr61LzH gOaad1saorXuoVXrs3eGLb1Cwi5sMJSzXSTuAXN8= Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:16:08 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Elizabeth Figura Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Almeida , Wolfram Sang , Arkadiusz Hiler , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/30] ntsync: Introduce NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY. Message-ID: <2024041254-that-laurel-30f9@gregkh> References: <20240329000621.148791-1-zfigura@codeweavers.com> <20240329000621.148791-5-zfigura@codeweavers.com> <2024041111-handsaw-scruffy-27f3@gregkh> <25522541.6Emhk5qWAg@camazotz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25522541.6Emhk5qWAg@camazotz> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:33:07PM -0500, Elizabeth Figura wrote: > > Rolling your own lock is tricky, and needs review from the locking > > maintainers. And probably some more documentation as to what is > > happening and why our normal types of locks can't be used here? > > Definitely. (Unfortunately this hasn't gotten attention from any locking > maintainer yet since your last call for review; not sure if there's > anything I can do there.) You only seem to have cc:ed one of the "LOCKING PRIMITIVES" maintainers on this patchset, not all of them, which might be the reason why it has been ignored :( Perhaps change that for the next version of this patchset? thanks, greg k-h