From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Subject: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe shadow stack test
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 14:11:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240523121149.575616-9-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240523121149.575616-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Adding uretprobe shadow stack test that runs all existing
uretprobe tests with shadow stack enabled if it's available.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
index 3ef324c2db50..fda456401284 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/stringify.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include <asm/prctl.h>
#include "uprobe_syscall.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_syscall_executed.skel.h"
@@ -297,6 +300,56 @@ static void test_uretprobe_syscall_call(void)
close(go[1]);
close(go[0]);
}
+
+/*
+ * Borrowed from tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_shadow_stack.c.
+ *
+ * For use in inline enablement of shadow stack.
+ *
+ * The program can't return from the point where shadow stack gets enabled
+ * because there will be no address on the shadow stack. So it can't use
+ * syscall() for enablement, since it is a function.
+ *
+ * Based on code from nolibc.h. Keep a copy here because this can't pull
+ * in all of nolibc.h.
+ */
+#define ARCH_PRCTL(arg1, arg2) \
+({ \
+ long _ret; \
+ register long _num asm("eax") = __NR_arch_prctl; \
+ register long _arg1 asm("rdi") = (long)(arg1); \
+ register long _arg2 asm("rsi") = (long)(arg2); \
+ \
+ asm volatile ( \
+ "syscall\n" \
+ : "=a"(_ret) \
+ : "r"(_arg1), "r"(_arg2), \
+ "0"(_num) \
+ : "rcx", "r11", "memory", "cc" \
+ ); \
+ _ret; \
+})
+
+#ifndef ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE
+#define ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE 0x5001
+#define ARCH_SHSTK_DISABLE 0x5002
+#define ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK (1ULL << 0)
+#endif
+
+static void test_uretprobe_shadow_stack(void)
+{
+ if (ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK)) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Run all of the uretprobe tests. */
+ test_uretprobe_regs_equal();
+ test_uretprobe_regs_change();
+ test_uretprobe_syscall_call();
+
+ ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_DISABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK);
+}
#else
static void test_uretprobe_regs_equal(void)
{
@@ -312,6 +365,11 @@ static void test_uretprobe_syscall_call(void)
{
test__skip();
}
+
+static void test_uretprobe_shadow_stack(void)
+{
+ test__skip();
+}
#endif
void test_uprobe_syscall(void)
@@ -322,4 +380,6 @@ void test_uprobe_syscall(void)
test_uretprobe_regs_change();
if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_syscall_call"))
test_uretprobe_syscall_call();
+ if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_shadow_stack"))
+ test_uretprobe_shadow_stack();
}
--
2.45.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-23 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-23 12:11 [PATCHv7 bpf-next 0/9] uprobe: uretprobe speed up Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 1/9] x86/shstk: Make return uprobe work with shadow stack Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 2/9] uprobe: Wire up uretprobe system call Jiri Olsa
2024-06-10 22:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-11 7:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 3/9] uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 4/9] selftests/x86: Add return uprobe shadow stack test Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 5/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs integrity Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 6/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs changes Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2024-06-10 22:02 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe shadow stack test Masami Hiramatsu
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 9/9] man2: Add uretprobe syscall page Jiri Olsa
2024-05-31 17:52 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 0/9] uprobe: uretprobe speed up Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-05 16:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-10 15:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-10 21:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-11 8:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-11 14:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240523121149.575616-9-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).