From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] syscalls: fix sys_fanotify_mark prototype
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 23:03:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240629210359.94426-1-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
My earlier fix missed an incorrect function prototype that shows up on
native 32-bit builds:
In file included from fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:14:
include/linux/syscalls.h:248:25: error: conflicting types for 'sys_fanotify_mark'; have 'long int(int, unsigned int, u32, u32, int, const char *)' {aka 'long int(int, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, int, const char *)'}
1924 | SYSCALL32_DEFINE6(fanotify_mark,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/syscalls.h:862:17: note: previous declaration of 'sys_fanotify_mark' with type 'long int(int, unsigned int, u64, int, const char *)' {aka 'long int(int, unsigned int, long long unsigned int, int, const char *)'}
On x86 and powerpc, the prototype is also wrong but hidden in an #ifdef,
so it never caused problems.
Add another alternative declaration that matches the conditional function
definition.
Fixes: 403f17a33073 ("parisc: use generic sys_fanotify_mark implementation")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
I've queued this fix in the asm-generic tree now
include/linux/syscalls.h | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h
index 63424af87bba..fff820c3e93e 100644
--- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
+++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
@@ -859,9 +859,15 @@ asmlinkage long sys_prlimit64(pid_t pid, unsigned int resource,
const struct rlimit64 __user *new_rlim,
struct rlimit64 __user *old_rlim);
asmlinkage long sys_fanotify_init(unsigned int flags, unsigned int event_f_flags);
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SPLIT_ARG64)
+asmlinkage long sys_fanotify_mark(int fanotify_fd, unsigned int flags,
+ unsigned int mask_1, unsigned int mask_2,
+ int dfd, const char __user * pathname);
+#else
asmlinkage long sys_fanotify_mark(int fanotify_fd, unsigned int flags,
u64 mask, int fd,
const char __user *pathname);
+#endif
asmlinkage long sys_name_to_handle_at(int dfd, const char __user *name,
struct file_handle __user *handle,
int __user *mnt_id, int flag);
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-29 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-29 21:03 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-06-29 21:31 ` [PATCH] syscalls: fix sys_fanotify_mark prototype Helge Deller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240629210359.94426-1-arnd@kernel.org \
--to=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox