From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
sonicadvance1@gmail.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-dev@igalia.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] futex: Wire up set_robust_list2 syscall
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 13:13:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202411021208.9UQz3ahR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241101162147.284993-4-andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Hi André,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core]
[also build test ERROR on tip/sched/core linus/master v6.12-rc5 next-20241101]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/asm]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andr-Almeida/futex-Use-explicit-sizes-for-compat_exit_robust_list/20241102-002419
base: tip/locking/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241101162147.284993-4-andrealmeid%40igalia.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] futex: Wire up set_robust_list2 syscall
config: arc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241102/202411021208.9UQz3ahR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241102/202411021208.9UQz3ahR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411021208.9UQz3ahR-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:455:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
455 | __SYSCALL(454, sys_futex_wake)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:456:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
456 | __SYSCALL(455, sys_futex_wait)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: note: (near initialization for 'sys_call_table[455]')
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:456:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
456 | __SYSCALL(455, sys_futex_wait)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:457:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
457 | __SYSCALL(456, sys_futex_requeue)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: note: (near initialization for 'sys_call_table[456]')
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:457:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
457 | __SYSCALL(456, sys_futex_requeue)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:458:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
458 | __SYSCALL(457, sys_statmount)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: note: (near initialization for 'sys_call_table[457]')
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:458:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
458 | __SYSCALL(457, sys_statmount)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:459:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
459 | __SYSCALL(458, sys_listmount)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: note: (near initialization for 'sys_call_table[458]')
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:459:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
459 | __SYSCALL(458, sys_listmount)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:460:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
460 | __SYSCALL(459, sys_lsm_get_self_attr)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: note: (near initialization for 'sys_call_table[459]')
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:460:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
460 | __SYSCALL(459, sys_lsm_get_self_attr)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:461:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
461 | __SYSCALL(460, sys_lsm_set_self_attr)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: note: (near initialization for 'sys_call_table[460]')
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:461:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
461 | __SYSCALL(460, sys_lsm_set_self_attr)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:462:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
462 | __SYSCALL(461, sys_lsm_list_modules)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: note: (near initialization for 'sys_call_table[461]')
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:462:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
462 | __SYSCALL(461, sys_lsm_list_modules)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:463:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
463 | __SYSCALL(462, sys_mseal)
| ^~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:36: note: (near initialization for 'sys_call_table[462]')
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:463:1: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL'
463 | __SYSCALL(462, sys_mseal)
| ^~~~~~~~~
>> ./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h:464:16: error: 'sys_set_robust_list2' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'sys_set_robust_list'?
464 | __SYSCALL(463, sys_set_robust_list2)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arc/kernel/sys.c:13:37: note: in definition of macro '__SYSCALL'
13 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^~~~
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-02 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-01 16:21 [PATCH v2 0/3] futex: Create set_robust_list2 André Almeida
2024-11-01 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] futex: Use explicit sizes for compat_exit_robust_list André Almeida
2024-11-02 5:44 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-02 14:57 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-01 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] futex: Create set_robust_list2 André Almeida
2024-11-02 16:40 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-04 11:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-04 21:55 ` André Almeida
2024-11-05 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-01 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] futex: Wire up set_robust_list2 syscall André Almeida
2024-11-02 5:13 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-11-02 6:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-02 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] futex: Create set_robust_list2 Florian Weimer
2024-11-04 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-04 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-04 12:36 ` Florian Weimer
2024-11-05 12:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-04 21:49 ` André Almeida
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202411021208.9UQz3ahR-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sonicadvance1@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).