linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	jack@suse.cz, cem@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	dchinner@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	catherine.hoang@oracle.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/14] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic()
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250421164241.GD25700@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2467484b-382b-47c2-ae70-4a41d63cf4fc@oracle.com>

On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 06:47:44AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 21/04/2025 05:00, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > @@ -843,6 +909,8 @@ xfs_file_dio_write(
> > >   		return xfs_file_dio_write_unaligned(ip, iocb, from);
> > >   	if (xfs_is_zoned_inode(ip))
> > >   		return xfs_file_dio_write_zoned(ip, iocb, from);
> > What happens to an IOCB_ATOMIC write to a zoned file?  I think the
> > ioend for an atomic write to a zoned file involves a similar change as
> > an outofplace atomic write to a file (one big transaction to absorb
> > all the mapping changes) but I don't think the zoned code quite does
> > that...?
> 
> Correct. For now, I don't think that we should try to support zoned device
> atomic writes. However we don't have proper checks for this. How about
> adding a xfs_has_zoned() check in xfs_get_atomic_write_{min, max, opt}()?

Well it turns out that was a stupid question -- zoned=1 can't be enabled
with reflink, which means there's no cow fallback so atomic writes just
plain don't work:

$ xfs_info /mnt
meta-data=/dev/sda               isize=512    agcount=4, agsize=32768 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
         =                       crc=1        finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=1
         =                       reflink=0    bigtime=1 inobtcount=1 nrext64=1
         =                       exchange=1   metadir=1
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=131072, imaxpct=25
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0, ftype=1, parent=1
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=16384, version=2
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =internal               extsz=4096   blocks=5061632, rtextents=5061632
         =                       rgcount=78   rgsize=65536 extents
         =                       zoned=1      start=131072 reserved=0
$ xfs_io -c 'statx -r -m 0x10000' /mnt/a | grep atomic
stat.atomic_write_unit_min = 0
stat.atomic_write_unit_max = 0
stat.atomic_write_segments_max = 0
stat.atomic_write_unit_max_opt = 0

I /think/ all you'd have to do is create an xfs_zoned_end_atomic_io
function that does what xfs_zoned_end_io but with a single
tr_atomic_ioend transaction; figure out how to convey "this is an
atomic out of place write" to xfs_end_ioend so that it knows to call
xfs_zoned_end_atomic_io; and then update the xfs_get_atomic_write*
helpers.

--D

> Thanks,
> John

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-21 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-15 12:14 [PATCH v7 00/14] large atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] fs: add atomic write unit max opt to statx John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] xfs: add helpers to compute log item overhead John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] xfs: add helpers to compute transaction reservation for finishing intent items John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] xfs: rename xfs_inode_can_atomicwrite() -> xfs_inode_can_hw_atomicwrite() John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] xfs: allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] xfs: refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] xfs: refine atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] xfs: add xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin() John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] xfs: add large atomic writes checks in xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin() John Garry
2025-04-15 17:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15 17:46     ` John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] xfs: commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-04-21  4:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-21  5:47     ` John Garry
2025-04-21 16:42       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-04-23  5:42         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23  8:19           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23 14:51             ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-23 14:53           ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-21 21:18   ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-22  6:08     ` John Garry
2025-04-23  5:18       ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-23  7:08         ` John Garry
2025-04-23  7:36           ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-23  5:44       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23  7:02         ` John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] xfs: add xfs_compute_atomic_write_unit_max() John Garry
2025-04-15 16:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15 16:35     ` John Garry
2025-04-15 16:39       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] xfs: update atomic write limits John Garry
2025-04-15 16:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] xfs: allow sysadmins to specify a maximum atomic write limit at mount time John Garry
2025-04-15 15:35   ` Randy Dunlap
2025-04-15 16:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15 22:36   ` [PATCH v7.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-16 10:08     ` John Garry
2025-04-16 16:26       ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250421164241.GD25700@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).