From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz,
cem@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
dchinner@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
catherine.hoang@oracle.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/15] xfs: ignore HW which cannot atomic write a single block
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:12:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250423151224.GC25675@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423083317.GB30432@lst.de>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:33:17AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 09:28:14AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> >> But maybe we should just delay setting the atomic values until later so
> >> that it can be done in a single pass? E.g. into xfs_setsize_buftarg
> >> which then should probably be rename to something like
> >> xfs_buftarg_setup.
> >>
> >
> > How about just do away with btp->bt_bdev_awu_{min, max} struct members, and
> > call bdev_atomic_write_unit_max(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev) [and same for
> > RT] to later to set the mp awu max values at mountfs time? I think that
> > would work..
>
> Sounds reasonable.
I disagree, leaving the hardware awu_min/max in the buftarg makes more
sense to me because the buftarg is our abstraction for a block device,
and these fields describe the atomic write units that we can use with
that block device.
IOWs, I don't like dumping even more into struct xfs_mount. xfs_group
has an awu_max for the software fallback, xfs_buftarg has an awu_min/max
for hardware, and even this V8 has yet a third pair of awu_min/max in
xfs_mount which I think is just the buftarg version but possibly
truncated. I find those last two pairs confusing.
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 12:27 [PATCH v8 00/15] large atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 01/15] fs: add atomic write unit max opt to statx John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 02/15] xfs: add helpers to compute log item overhead John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 03/15] xfs: add helpers to compute transaction reservation for finishing intent items John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 04/15] xfs: rename xfs_inode_can_atomicwrite() -> xfs_inode_can_hw_atomicwrite() John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 05/15] xfs: ignore HW which cannot atomic write a single block John Garry
2025-04-23 0:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-23 7:15 ` John Garry
2025-04-23 8:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23 8:28 ` John Garry
2025-04-23 8:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23 15:12 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-04-23 15:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 06/15] xfs: allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 07/15] xfs: refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 08/15] xfs: refine atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 09/15] xfs: add xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin() John Garry
2025-04-23 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 10/15] xfs: add large atomic writes checks in xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin() John Garry
2025-04-23 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23 8:18 ` John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 11/15] xfs: commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-04-23 8:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23 14:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-23 15:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23 15:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-23 16:38 ` John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 12/15] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-04-23 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23 8:29 ` John Garry
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 13/15] xfs: add xfs_compute_atomic_write_unit_max() John Garry
2025-04-23 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 14/15] xfs: update atomic write limits John Garry
2025-04-23 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-22 12:27 ` [PATCH v8 15/15] xfs: allow sysadmins to specify a maximum atomic write limit at mount time John Garry
2025-04-23 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23 15:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-23 15:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250423151224.GC25675@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).