From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8882328A3EF; Wed, 7 May 2025 13:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746626301; cv=none; b=PM9KdJ3tp2c0tBI5ISB600dGgKeHaAAr2CzaF7SATHvSiM9PNHfpWIxSih2CfU3/YBLac2QgrE1vmsM43uMpHaqQc/BYtf2571kk2Xl0P/GMD8XVkl+m2R05AYqTBoQ0xTDmJWLBPUhHtIhbsN9rSn+FaYvVkdmyr5WUO5utoVE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746626301; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/0Q/u6Uimv2ZxNumXH8o5ajq0edxS5+j8L2aCHsi8D0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SS+kMMJL7kC2zpDiTEtGkmJNj5EvyzyxBa5ZMqThh67Yajwr9ap85VrAn8qJCVkoLDLH2l8IBTcFJH4SkWA4z5DigXVIR4pK2oDNQUYS1VqCXIgj3h4NNgAYThRt0LX7G5IPT8qGVa5r2Etuwn1kY1i7Jk92C9odP45yRvfafyc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jDImqiNJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jDImqiNJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746626299; x=1778162299; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/0Q/u6Uimv2ZxNumXH8o5ajq0edxS5+j8L2aCHsi8D0=; b=jDImqiNJdnO4ePwY5bb/rtYDrbUTN7U6FNGehtD+tEg4Ki/VW+Kr5MQl eR+MpZ5HBAcsp4WuSBn8fNZc6rn8jpIgsowrGhb1FKYflRDEQTsDyJ2o3 05uSVq4akC6ppd+f3qr0r9NaVy1YEHkAL6bpBTWjSHoiB8Y6jReEt/aYf lc7bnKR/gz4T3gz69nPVAUcvy/PUVH4lE8Rs3FMsm0w+9a8iTBGhbmy4Z OugemXHZdjpPCgdbaZuE2bxkj8U62TyrnMgP3WYpgASudLSBt+9iVYfLp MfL55/HdO4sazfxmogj/ue7dCmXstQ32OuJ3S93SYHIrsqrRrl8uQ/iEC Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5NKCv8ceS3G9NofLWRtuZQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GpFFbxJgQUaC6dO2rt+NSw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11426"; a="47613044" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,269,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="47613044" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 May 2025 06:58:18 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vnx8wscpTRCgNzf2C2Pp5w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: K1Ux9pV0TFuSEc0nzuSVgg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,269,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="140011265" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2025 06:58:15 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uCfHo-0007vN-2T; Wed, 07 May 2025 13:58:12 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 21:58:03 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Maxime =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9lair?= , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, john.johansen@canonical.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, mic@digikod.net, kees@kernel.org, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com, takedakn@nttdata.co.jp, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxime =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9lair?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Wire up the lsm_manage_policy syscall Message-ID: <202505072131.ogtsaLPI-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250506143254.718647-2-maxime.belair@canonical.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250506143254.718647-2-maxime.belair@canonical.com> Hi Maxime, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 9c32cda43eb78f78c73aee4aa344b777714e259b] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maxime-B-lair/Wire-up-the-lsm_manage_policy-syscall/20250506-224212 base: 9c32cda43eb78f78c73aee4aa344b777714e259b patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250506143254.718647-2-maxime.belair%40canonical.com patch subject: [PATCH 1/3] Wire up the lsm_manage_policy syscall config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250507/202505072131.ogtsaLPI-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f819f46284f2a79790038e1f6649172789734ae8) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250507/202505072131.ogtsaLPI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505072131.ogtsaLPI-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> :1618:2: warning: syscall lsm_manage_policy not implemented [-W#warnings] 1618 | #warning syscall lsm_manage_policy not implemented | ^ 1 warning generated. -- >> :1618:2: warning: syscall lsm_manage_policy not implemented [-W#warnings] 1618 | #warning syscall lsm_manage_policy not implemented | ^ 1 warning generated. -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki