From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6045F278155; Mon, 19 May 2025 12:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747657934; cv=none; b=uj2ZYEa9P9D6P4EzOa++d4h/1ffWyt+LlcofIQ1beuq5ai3YfsGEXd60HX8V4IxcIdfrXdmtkspIte011p0k9rC9TthRk7GleDwIOhjfKbhksZadUk140Y0tq1kZ9oBqSbV87KRl2j3FvNII6Qzc2jMKn79v0+tahQeuK5354S0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747657934; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HoUHAxsmz0lVERwzrMNPRR2kgRH7kTLlbZ6PpdDPuHw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=drECoXdtg2OdJfGmNdQUJID34YriZTxyf91rR8cxsnZTjizfy3vvAGUQOwuu6W8s7pXUsv+PzT+dF58A1lezkH7xybURV5wLIr3lNrJzyQsaGm1zPD89UV6dnyMzDlnc+hS3mb+WYbj885SlmX0EXgQtB4N8x85IydpbeO/OHis= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=bo1Y0PW3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="bo1Y0PW3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF66FC4CEF0; Mon, 19 May 2025 12:32:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1747657933; bh=HoUHAxsmz0lVERwzrMNPRR2kgRH7kTLlbZ6PpdDPuHw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bo1Y0PW3xzzj9/Nf4BKw+IflPjrSFhX3grLA1qD0eUvvIDWdbziWWlktiAY0H4THb +am8I8u9EisrBdHux1//DxJ+P+8Jcwbtr5KNol/UeWaNY26ksHADBoIEfQvLV6QWPt C4/XlGwHBcaEVAGtYPyYy3gNhYClTaiRUj0wM0F0= Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 14:32:10 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Bharat Agrawal Cc: "hughd@google.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "rientjes@google.com" , "zhangyiru3@huawei.com" , "liuzixian4@huawei.com" , "mhocko@suse.com" , "wuxu.wu@huawei.com" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "legion@kernel.org" Subject: Re: mlock ulimits for SHM_HUGETLB Message-ID: <2025051946-ransack-number-e5e7@gregkh> References: <2025051914-bounding-outscore-4d50@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:04:58PM +0000, Bharat Agrawal wrote: > Thanks Greg for the response. RHEL has not been very helpful. I'm not looking to ask for patches because of the old versions. > These messages appear in production runs, raising concerns about possible failures. Thus, the question is: Can they be ignored safely? Again, you are paying them for support for this, please use them, there is nothing that the community can do to help out here, sorry. greg k-h