public inbox for linux-api@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: O_CLOEXEC use for OPEN_TREE_CLOEXEC
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 11:00:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260116-alias-ausnimmt-4788c83a66d2@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lhuwm1ji7bl.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 09:55:10AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Christian Brauner:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 11:40:55PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> In <linux/mount.h>, we have this:
> >> 
> >> #define OPEN_TREE_CLOEXEC      O_CLOEXEC       /* Close the file on execve() */
> >> 
> >> This causes a few pain points for us to on the glibc side when we mirror
> >> this into <linux/mount.h> becuse O_CLOEXEC is defined in <fcntl.h>,
> >> which is one of the headers that's completely incompatible with the UAPI
> >> headers.
> >> 
> >> The reason why this is painful is because O_CLOEXEC has at least three
> >> different values across architectures: 0x80000, 0x200000, 0x400000
> >> 
> >> Even for the UAPI this isn't ideal because it effectively burns three
> >> open_tree flags, unless the flags are made architecture-specific, too.
> >
> > I think that just got cargo-culted... A long time ago some API define as
> > O_CLOEXEC and now a lot of APIs have done the same.
> 
> Yes, it looks like inotify is in the same boat.

It's unfortunately nost just inotify...:

include/linux/net.h:#define SOCK_CLOEXEC        O_CLOEXEC
include/uapi/drm/drm.h:#define DRM_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC
include/uapi/linux/eventfd.h:#define EFD_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC
include/uapi/linux/eventpoll.h:#define EPOLL_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC
include/uapi/linux/inotify.h:#define IN_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC
include/uapi/linux/signalfd.h:#define SFD_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC
include/uapi/linux/timerfd.h:#define TFD_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC

> 
> > I'm pretty sure we can't change that now but we can document that this
> > shouldn't be ifdefed and instead be a separate per-syscall bit. But I
> > think that's the best we can do right now.
> 
> Maybe add something like this as a safety measure, to ensure that the
> flags don't overlap?
> 
> diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
> index c58674a20cad..5bbfd379ec44 100644
> --- a/fs/namespace.c
> +++ b/fs/namespace.c
> @@ -3069,6 +3069,9 @@ static struct file *vfs_open_tree(int dfd, const char __user *filename, unsigned
>  	bool detached = flags & OPEN_TREE_CLONE;
>  
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(OPEN_TREE_CLOEXEC != O_CLOEXEC);
> +	BUILD_BUG_IN(!(O_CLOEXEC & OPEN_TREE_CLONE));
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(!((AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT | AT_RECURSIVE | AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) &
> +		       (O_CLOEXEC | OPEN_TREE_CLONE)));

Yeah, we can do something like that!

      reply	other threads:[~2026-01-16 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-13 22:40 O_CLOEXEC use for OPEN_TREE_CLOEXEC Florian Weimer
2026-01-14 16:03 ` Christian Brauner
2026-01-14 19:42   ` Andy Lutomirski
2026-01-14 21:18     ` Aleksa Sarai
2026-01-15  8:55   ` Florian Weimer
2026-01-16 10:00     ` Christian Brauner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260116-alias-ausnimmt-4788c83a66d2@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox