From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: John Ericson <mail@johnericson.me>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Farid Zakaria <farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 4/7] fs: support FD_FAILFS_ROOT in fchroot()
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:30:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723-work-failfs-v1-4-3f69b9a9e958@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723-work-failfs-v1-0-3f69b9a9e958@kernel.org>
Allow a process to move its root directory into failfs via
fchroot(FD_FAILFS_ROOT). From that point on every absolute path lookup
and every absolute symlink fails with EOPNOTSUPP. Combined with
fchdir(FD_FAILFS_ROOT) this leaves the process with lookups anchored
at explicit directory file descriptors only. It is the fs_struct
equivalent of RESOLVE_BENEATH. This allows taks to drop their filesystem
state completely.
Callers with CAP_SYS_CHROOT in their user namespace may always do
this, mirroring chroot(2). Unprivileged callers are subject to two
requirements (which may be loosened later):
(1) no_new_privs must be set
After entering failfs suid binaries on regular mounts remain
reachable via inherited directory file descriptors or the working
directory. A setuid program executing with an unusable root
directory might be tricked by this. I'm not 100% convinced that this
is needed but it feels more secure initially and it also forces more
no_new_privs on userspace. So win-win imo.
(2) The caller must not already be chrooted.
The root directory is what confines .. resolution. The failfs root
can never be reached by walking up a real mount tree. A task whose
root is failfs has no .. barrier left below the top of its mount
tree. A .. walk from any real directory fd it still holds climbs
to the mount-namespace root. Which is kinda the point if you want to
do fd-based lookup only. If failfs prevented you from doing that
then it doesn't make a lot of sense.
A task that a privileged manager chrooted into a subtree could use
chroot()ing into failfs as a way to allow for an inherited fd to
resolve it again.
So reject already-chrooted callers closing that issue without losing
anything for the intended self-sandboxing use case.
There's also some thought needed around shared fs_struct state. It's
obviously possible to chroot into failfs with a shared fs_struct if the
caller has CAP_SYS_CHROOT and shares the fs_struct or if the caller is
no_new_privs and shares the fs_struct. The non-chrooted-currently
requirement still applies.
Once entered, failfs is a throw-away-the-key moment. The task is
considered chrooted so it cannot create user namespaces to regain
CAP_SYS_CHROOT. chroot()/fchroot() back out require CAP_SYS_CHROOT.
The only other exit is setns() to a mount namespace file descriptor
which requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN over the target namespace plus
CAP_SYS_CHROOT and CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the caller's user namespace and
resets both root and working directory. A process that closes or never
had such file descriptors and restricts *chdir()/*chroot()/setns() via
seccomp has thrown away the key.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
fs/open.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
index c57f641f2e29..8adc9f00889a 100644
--- a/fs/open.c
+++ b/fs/open.c
@@ -618,6 +618,27 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(chroot, const char __user *, filename)
return error;
}
+static int fchroot_failfs(void)
+{
+ struct path path;
+ int error;
+
+ if (!ns_capable(current_user_ns(), CAP_SYS_CHROOT)) {
+ if (!task_no_new_privs(current))
+ return -EPERM;
+ /* Moving the root to failfs lifts the old root's ".." barrier. */
+ if (current_chrooted())
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
+
+ failfs_get_root(&path);
+ error = security_path_chroot(&path);
+ if (!error)
+ set_fs_root(current->fs, &path);
+ path_put(&path);
+ return error;
+}
+
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(fchroot, int, fd, unsigned int, flags)
{
int error;
@@ -625,6 +646,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(fchroot, int, fd, unsigned int, flags)
if (flags)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (fd == FD_FAILFS_ROOT)
+ return fchroot_failfs();
+
CLASS(fd_raw, f)(fd);
if (fd_empty(f))
return -EBADF;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 11:30 [PATCH RFC 0/7] fs: add failfs Christian Brauner
2026-07-23 11:30 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] " Christian Brauner
2026-07-23 11:30 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] fs: add FD_FAILFS_ROOT and support it in fchdir() Christian Brauner
2026-07-23 11:30 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] fs: add fchroot() Christian Brauner
2026-07-23 11:30 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-07-23 12:49 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] fs: support FD_FAILFS_ROOT in fchroot() Andy Lutomirski
2026-07-23 13:01 ` Christian Brauner
2026-07-23 13:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2026-07-23 14:35 ` Christian Brauner
2026-07-23 16:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2026-07-23 14:42 ` Jann Horn
2026-07-23 14:07 ` Jann Horn
2026-07-23 16:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2026-07-23 11:30 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] arch: hookup fchroot() system call Christian Brauner
2026-07-23 11:30 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] selftests/filesystems: add failfs selftests Christian Brauner
2026-07-23 11:30 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] Documentation: add failfs documentation Christian Brauner
2026-07-23 14:04 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
2026-07-23 12:53 ` [PATCH RFC 0/7] fs: add failfs Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723-work-failfs-v1-4-3f69b9a9e958@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mail@johnericson.me \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox