From: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@gmail.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH] Added PR_SET_PROCTITLE_AREA option for prctl()
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:11:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e8340490910100011u17497293o613334c64f1543c8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f11576a0910092332s6e0e3dcs35864e3a2164be0@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 2:32 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> It does seem like a maximum spin count should be put in there - and
>> maybe a timeout as well (since with FUSE etc it's possible to engineer
>> page faults that take arbitrarily long).
>> Also, it occurs to me that:
>
> makes sense.
> I like maximum spin rather than timeout.
I'm worried about the scenario where process A sets its cmdline buffer
to point to a page which will take a _VERY_ long time to pagein (maybe
forever), and then process B goes to try to read its cmdline. What
happens now?
Process A can arrange for this to happen by using a FUSE filesystem
that sits on a read forever. And since the first thing the admin's
likely to do to track down the problem is 'ps awux', this is liable to
be a rather nasty DoS...
Of course, this is no worse than it is now - it's already possible to
replace the page in question. But we should think about ways this
could be fixed for good...
>
>>> + do {
>>> + seq = read_seqbegin(&mm->arg_lock);
>>> +
>>> + len = mm->arg_end - mm->arg_start;
>>> + if (len > PAGE_SIZE)
>>> + len = PAGE_SIZE;
>>
>> If arg_end or arg_start are modified after this, is it truly safe to
>> assume that len will remain <= PAGE_SIZE without a memory barrier
>> before the conditional?
>
> 1) access_process_vm() doesn't return error value.
> 2) read_seqretry(&mm->arg_lock, seq)) check seq, not mm->arg_start or len.
>
> then, if arg_{start,end} is modified, access_process_vm() may return 0
> and strnlen
> makes bad calculation, but read_seqretry() can detect its modify
> rightly. I think.
No, I'm worried about what if the compiler decides to rewrite like so:
if (mm->arg_end - mm->arg_start > PAGE_SIZE)
len = PAGE_SIZE;
else /* here we reload arg_end/arg_start! */
len = mm->arg_end - mm->arg_start;
Now we might write into buffer more than PAGE_SIZE bytes, which is
probably a buffer overrun into kernel space...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-10 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-09 4:50 [resend][PATCH] Added PR_SET_PROCTITLE_AREA option for prctl() KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-10 0:13 ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-10 2:22 ` Bryan Donlan
[not found] ` <3e8340490910091922g7891b31al649e91f15ffae687-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-10 2:42 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20091009194250.eb76e338.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-10 2:57 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-10-10 6:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
[not found] ` <2f11576a0910092332s6e0e3dcs35864e3a2164be0-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-10 6:39 ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-12 19:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
[not found] ` <20091013022335.C741.A69D9226-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-12 19:22 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20091012122246.a941013b.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-13 0:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-10 7:11 ` Bryan Donlan [this message]
[not found] ` <3e8340490910100011u17497293o613334c64f1543c8-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-12 19:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
[not found] ` <20091013031853.C744.A69D9226-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-12 19:33 ` Bryan Donlan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e8340490910100011u17497293o613334c64f1543c8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bdonlan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tss@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).