From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] generic syscalls: wire up memory protection keys syscalls Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 23:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4151348.Xje1rehFl0@wuerfel> References: <20160607204712.594DE00A@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20160607204725.A731CB1E@viggo.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160607204725.A731CB1E@viggo.jf.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 1:47:25 PM CEST Dave Hansen wrote: > From: Dave Hansen > > These new syscalls are implemented as generic code, so enable > them for architectures like arm64 which use the generic syscall > table. > > According to Arnd: > > Even if the support is x86 specific for the forseeable > future, it may be good to reserve the number just in > case. The other architecture specific syscall lists are > usually left to the individual arch maintainers, most a > lot of the newer architectures share this table. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen > Cc: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org