From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Generalized TTL Security Mechanism Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:10:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4B4B5B84.3090409@gmail.com> References: <20100110220034.4d46ba8a@nehalam> <4B4B0AA3.6010207@gmail.com> <20100111082529.3d5cdae3@nehalam> <4B4B5A0A.3090600@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B4B5A0A.3090600@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Le 11/01/2010 18:04, Eric Dumazet a =C3=A9crit : > Given this is an IP level option, check could be done at IP level, so= that other protocols > can use it too ? Oops, this is stupid, we dont have the socket pointer at IP level :)