From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH glibc 2.31 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup and thread creation (v12)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:45:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a6f6326-ea82-e031-0fe0-7263ed97e797@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ef0mr6qj.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
On 9/11/19 3:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Carlos O'Donell:
>
>> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
>> registration like we do for set_robust_list().
>
> Note that this depends on the in-tree system call numbers list, which I
> still need to finish according to Joseph's specifications.
Which work is this? Do you have a URL reference to WIP?
> (We have something that should work for us as long as we can get large
> machines from the lab, but I agree that it's not very useful if glibc
> bot-cycle time is roughly one business day.)
Yeah, we have to discuss how to accelerate this.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190807142726.2579-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
2019-08-07 14:27 ` [PATCH glibc 2.31 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup and thread creation (v12) Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-11 18:26 ` Florian Weimer
2019-09-11 19:00 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-09-11 19:08 ` Florian Weimer
2019-09-11 19:45 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2019-09-11 19:54 ` Florian Weimer
2019-09-11 19:58 ` Florian Weimer
2019-09-11 20:08 ` Rich Felker
2019-09-13 15:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-14 1:36 ` Florian Weimer
2019-08-07 14:27 ` [PATCH glibc 2.31 2/5] glibc: sched_getcpu(): use rseq cpu_id TLS on Linux (v5) Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a6f6326-ea82-e031-0fe0-7263ed97e797@redhat.com \
--to=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=bmaurer@fb.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).