From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/27] mm: Handle THP/HugeTLB shadow stack page fault Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:08:30 -0700 Message-ID: <4ba0410c-eadf-19f7-1931-ee7f9e38fde8@linux.intel.com> References: <20180710222639.8241-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180710222639.8241-15-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180710222639.8241-15-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yu-cheng Yu , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 07/10/2018 03:26 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > @@ -1347,6 +1353,8 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, pmd_t orig_pmd) > pmd_t entry; > entry = mk_huge_pmd(new_page, vma->vm_page_prot); > entry = maybe_pmd_mkwrite(pmd_mkdirty(entry), vma); > + if (is_shstk_mapping(vma->vm_flags)) > + entry = pmd_mkdirty_shstk(entry); This pattern is repeated enough that it makes me wonder if we should just be doing the shadowstack PTE creation in mk_huge_pmd() itself. Or, should we just be setting the shadowstack pte bit combination in vma->vm_page_prot so we don't have to go set it explicitly every time?