From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: futex(2) man page update help request Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:56:19 -0700 Message-ID: <5374F1B3.9080006@zytor.com> References: <537346E5.4050407@gmail.com> <537407ED.8050606@zytor.com> <5374C54B.7040408@gmail.com> <20140515154246.GC6926@rei.Home> <5374E2A4.2070408@zytor.com> <20140515160152.GA7529@rei.Home> <5374E653.2080309@zytor.com> <20140515161753.GA7959@rei.Home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140515161753.GA7959@rei.Home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: chrubis@suse.cz Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , Darren Hart , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Jakub Jelinek , "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" , lkml , Davidlohr Bueso , Arnd Bergmann , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Linux API , Carlos O'Donell List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 05/15/2014 09:17 AM, chrubis@suse.cz wrote: >> >> It should be quite easy to extract from klibc. > > That is not the main concern here. If I extract the code I would have to > watch for any changes manually. If it was in a library or a separate > repository all that would be needed is to add it as dependency/git > submodule and I would get all updates automatically. > Yes, and for that to happen someone needs to do the work to extract it. I don't have the cycles myself at the moment. -hpa