linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] futex: introduce an optimistic spinning futex
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:28:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CEAD41.9030307@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761iq3bp3.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>

On 07/21/2014 12:42 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@hp.com>  writes:
>
>> This patch series introduces two new futex command codes to support
>> a new optimistic spinning futex for implementing an exclusive lock
>> primitive that should perform better than the same primitive using
>> the wait-wake futex in cases where the lock owner is actively working
>> instead of waiting for I/O completion.
> How would you distinguish those two cases automatically?

I don't really distinguish between these two. The purpose of this 
paragraph is to show the best use cases for the spinning futexes is when 
the lock owner is not likely to sleep while in the critical section.

>> This patch series improves futex performance on two different fronts:
>>   1) Reducing the amount of the futex spinlock contention by using 2
>>      different spinlocks instead of just one for the wait-wake futex.
>>   2) Eliminating the context switching overhead and latency due to the
>>      sleeping and the waking of the waiting tasks.
> FWIW the main problem is currently that switch-through-idle is so
> slow. I think improving that would give a boost to far more
> situations.

If we can improve the context switching overhead, that can certainly 
help a lot of applications.

>
>> Patch 4 changes sleeping queue from a simple FIFO list to an rbtree
>> sorted by process priority as well as the sequeunce the tasks enter
>> the kernel.
> This seems to mix new functionality with performance improvements?
>
> Generally adding new ordering in an user interface is risky because
> often user programs have been tuned for specific old ordering.

Not really, this patch is to emulate the current behavior of the 
wait-wake futex which is queued in a priority queue. Because of 
spinning, tasks may enter into sleep state in different order than when 
they enter into the kernel. That is why I keep a sequence number to 
track who go into the kernel first.

-Longman

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-22 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-21 15:24 [RFC PATCH 0/5] futex: introduce an optimistic spinning futex Waiman Long
2014-07-21 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] futex: add new exclusive lock & unlock command codes Waiman Long
2014-07-21 16:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 18:22     ` Waiman Long
     [not found]       ` <53CEABD7.3030509-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-22 21:00         ` Thomas Gleixner
     [not found] ` <1405956271-34339-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-21 15:24   ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] futex: add optimistic spinning to FUTEX_SPIN_LOCK Waiman Long
     [not found]     ` <1405956271-34339-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-21 17:15       ` Davidlohr Bueso
     [not found]         ` <1405962929.11927.19.camel-5JQ4ckphU/8SZAcGdq5asR6epYMZPwEe5NbjCUgZEJk@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-22 18:46           ` Waiman Long
2014-07-21 20:17     ` Jason Low
2014-07-22 19:34       ` Waiman Long
2014-07-21 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] spinning futex: move a wakened task to spinning Waiman Long
2014-07-21 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] spinning futex: put waiting tasks in a sorted rbtree Waiman Long
2014-07-21 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] futex, doc: add a document on how to use the spinning futexes Waiman Long
2014-07-21 15:45   ` Randy Dunlap
2014-07-22  3:19     ` Waiman Long
2014-07-21 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] futex: introduce an optimistic spinning futex Andi Kleen
2014-07-21 16:45   ` Andi Kleen
     [not found]     ` <871tte3bjw.fsf-KWJ+5VKanrL29G5dvP0v1laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-21 17:20       ` Darren Hart
     [not found]     ` <CFF29A00.9D44A%dvhart@linux.intel.com>
     [not found]       ` <CFF29A00.9D44A%dvhart-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-21 17:41         ` Darren Hart
     [not found]           ` <CFF29E4A.9D44E%dvhart-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-21 20:16             ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-21 21:27               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-21 21:31                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-21 21:47                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-21 22:41                     ` Darren Hart
2014-07-22  1:01                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22  1:34                         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-07-22  2:31                           ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-22  3:06                           ` Davidlohr Bueso
     [not found]                           ` <20140721213457.46623e2f-f9ZlEuEWxVcJvu8Pb33WZ0EMvNT87kid@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-22  7:47                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22  8:39                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22  8:48                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22  9:59                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 20:25                                     ` Waiman Long
2014-07-22 20:52                                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 20:21                         ` Waiman Long
2014-07-22 21:03                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22  0:32                   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-22  7:35                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-21 21:43                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-21 18:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 18:35     ` Waiman Long
2014-07-22 18:28   ` Waiman Long [this message]
     [not found]   ` <8761iq3bp3.fsf-KWJ+5VKanrL29G5dvP0v1laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-23  4:55     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-23  6:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-23  7:25         ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-23  7:35           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-23  7:39             ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-23  7:52               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-21 21:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-07-21 21:41   ` Thomas Gleixner
     [not found]   ` <20140721211801.GA12149-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-22 19:36     ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53CEAD41.9030307@hp.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).