From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf: Add sampling of the raw monotonic clock Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:25:08 -0600 Message-ID: <5425BD94.4030006@gmail.com> References: <1411491787-25938-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <1411491787-25938-2-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <87sijhk21x.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <1411642198.4768.30.camel@hornet> <8738bekith.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <1411729103.3852.19.camel@hornet> <1411742306.1669.6.camel@leonhard> <1411743959.3852.45.camel@hornet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1411743959.3852.45.camel@hornet> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Pawel Moll , Namhyung Kim Cc: Richard Cochran , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , John Stultz , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 9/26/14, 9:05 AM, Pawel Moll wrote: > To do the correlation you need both timestamps to be "taken" > simultaneously: > > perf event user event > -----O--------------+-------------O------> t_mono > : | : > : V : > -----O----------------------------O------> t_perf > > Of course it's not possible get both values literally at the same time, > but placing them in a atomic context a couple of instructions from each > other still gives pretty good results. The larger this distance is, the An early patchset on this topic added the realtime clock as an event and an ioctl was used to push a sample into the event stream. In that case you have wall clock and perf-clock samples taken in the same kernel context and about as close together as you can get. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/27/158 https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/27/159 David