From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shuah Khan Subject: rt-tester - move under selftests Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:10:46 -0600 Message-ID: <5446BDC6.4040502@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org, mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Andrew/Ingo/Thomas, You are all on the signed-off list for rt-tester. I have been poking around the source tree looking for existing test and came across rt-tester. What are your thoughts on rt-tester suitability to reside under tools/testing/selftest and becoming part of kselftest target? Would you like see it moved under the kselftest umbrella? thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org | (970) 217-8978