From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karol Lewandowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Add kdbus implementation Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:58:35 +0100 Message-ID: <54536B5B.1050604@samsung.com> References: <54520A21.20404@samsung.com> <54521697.1030900@samsung.com> <20141030144709.GA19721@kroah.com> <545297CC.6020306@samsung.com> <20141030231310.0b65b762@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20141030231310.0b65b762-mUKnrFFms3BCCTY1wZZT65JpZx93mCW/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: One Thousand Gnomes Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Kosina , Linux API , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, John Stultz , Arnd Bergmann , Tejun Heo , Ryan Lortie , Simon McVittie , daniel-cYrQPVfZoowdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, David Herrmann , Paul Moore , "casey.schaufler-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , marcel-kz+m5ild9QBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, tixxdz-Umm1ozX2/EEdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, javier.martinez-ZGY8ohtN/8pPYcu2f3hruQ@public.gmane.org, alban.crequy-ZGY8ohtN/8pPYcu2f3hruQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 2014-10-31 00:13, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: >>> The core calls are already mediated by LSM today, right? We don't want >>> anyone to be parsing the data stream through an LSM, that idea got >>> rejected a long time ago as something that is really not a good idea. >> >> Parsing data is out of question, of course, but this is not what we were >> proposing. > > Why is it out of the question. If it's a socket you can just a BPF filter > on it, so why can't kdbus support similar basic functionality ? Fair point. I think that none of us simply considered this till now. Thanks -- Karol Lewandowski, Samsung R&D Institute Poland