From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arend van Spriel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] linux-wireless: Added psk in struct cfg80211_connect_params needed for offloading 4way handshake to driver Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:54:17 +0100 Message-ID: <5461DCC9.5050702@broadcom.com> References: <1415698161.2163.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1415698161.2163.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Berg , "Gautam (Gautam Kumar) Shukla" Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Jithu Jance , Sreenath S List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 11-11-14 10:29, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 05:56 +0000, Gautam (Gautam Kumar) Shukla wrote: >> For offloading 4 way handshake to driver, currently we don't have any >> member of struct cfg80211_connect_params to pass PSK from supplicant >> to driver. I have added psk for the same and added rest of the code >> needed in nl80211.h and nl80211.c to parse and make it available to >> driver. >> From supplicant, we already have psk member field in assoc_params to >> use . >> >> Tested on x86 linux. > > Your commit message needs serious work. > > Also, there's a competing approach from QCA that's far more suited. I probably was not paying attention to it, but would you have a reference to this. > In either case though, I'm going to ask which driver is going to use > this and when it's going to land in mainline. I had the same question ;-) > johannes > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >