From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:36:02 -0400 Message-ID: <5500C352.2060104@oracle.com> References: <1426107294-21551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1426107294-21551-1-git-send-email-mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton Cc: Johannes Weiner , Dave Chinner , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Wu Fengguang , linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, LKML , Linux API List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 03/11/2015 04:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > The second patch is the first step in the transition plan. It changes > the default but it is NOT an upstream material. It is aimed for brave > testers who can cope with failures. I have talked to Andrew and he > was willing to keep that patch in mmotm tree. It would be even better > to have this in linux-next because the testing coverage would be even > bigger. Dave Chinner has also shown an interest to integrate this into > his xfstest farm. It would be great if Fenguang could add it into the > zero testing project too (if the pushing the patch into linux-next > would be too controversial). Stuff in mmotm automatically end up in linux-next. Thanks, Sasha