From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 22:47:32 +0200 Message-ID: <55677EE4.2040903@nod.at> References: <87pp63jcca.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87siaxuvik.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87wq004im1.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20150528140839.GD28842@ubuntumail> <87lhg8pwvz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87fv6gikfn.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kenton Varda , "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Serge Hallyn , Seth Forshee , Linux API , Linux Containers , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Michael Kerrisk-manpages , Linux FS Devel , Tejun Heo List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Am 28.05.2015 um 22:12 schrieb Kenton Varda: > We never mount sysfs in Sandstorm. sysfs is ABI and applications depend on it. Even glibc is using sysfs. Currently it has fallback paths but these may go away... Thanks, //richard