From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Subject: Re: Next round: revised futex(2) man page for review Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:44:16 +0200 Message-ID: <55B643C0.1080807@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Heinrich Schuchardt , Thomas Gleixner , Darren Hart , Torvald Riegel Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, Carlos O'Donell , Ingo Molnar , Jakub Jelinek , linux-man , lkml , Davidlohr Bueso , Arnd Bergmann , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Linux API , Roland McGrath , Anton Blanchard , Eric Dumazet , bill o gallmeister , Jan Kiszka , Daniel Wagner , Rich Felker , Andy Lutomirski , bert hubert , Rusty Russell List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 07/27/2015 04:17 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > instruction. A thread maybe unable > > to << missing word > > acquire a lock because it is > already acquired by another thread. It then may pass the lock's > flag as futex word and the value representing the acquired state > as the expected value to a futex() wait operation. Thanks, Heinrich. Fixed. Cheers, Michael