From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:52:20 +0100 Message-ID: <5710ABC4.5070505@arm.com> References: <1459519381-34441-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> <570F593D.6040809@arm.com> <20160414192540.GD20512@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160414192540.GD20512-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Greg KH , Vladimir Murzin Cc: Sudeep Holla , arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org, daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org, liviu.dudau-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, gnomes-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org, peter-WaGBZJeGNqdsbIuE7sb01tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, andy.shevchenko-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-serial-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 14/04/16 20:25, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:47:57AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 01/04/16 15:02, Vladimir Murzin wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patch series provides the basic support for running ucLinux on V2M-MPS2 >>> platform. >>> >>> With these patches applied ucLinux can be run on both HW and FVP models >>> with Cortex-M3/M4/M7 configurations. >> >> Any objection to get it merged? >> >> Sudeep Holla noticed that there is merge conflict against linux-next >> with PIC32 uart (Makefile and serial_core.h), so should I provide >> conflict resolution or do rebase on someone's branch? >> >> Anyway, I'd be glad to know how it should be processed further? > > I have no objection to the tty/serial changes, so if this all goes > through the arm-soc tree, that's fine with me. > Thanks Greg, can I take this as Ack ? arm-soc guys might expect to see that tag :) Hi Vladimir, I have pulled this series into git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git for-next/armv7-vexpress-updates I will stick Greg's tag when it comes. -- Regards, Sudeep