linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: paul@paul-moore.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	jmorris@namei.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
	stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, mic@digikod.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 08/11] Smack: implement setselfattr and getselfattr hooks
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:49:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6442e8d3.650a0220.f3e8d.6a3f@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421174259.2458-9-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:42:56AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Implement Smack support for security_[gs]etselfattr.
> Refactor the setprocattr hook to avoid code duplication.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
>  security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index 3cf862fcbe08..902b39c187bf 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -3552,6 +3552,41 @@ static void smack_d_instantiate(struct dentry *opt_dentry, struct inode *inode)
>  	return;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * smack_getselfattr - Smack current process attribute
> + * @attr: which attribute to fetch
> + * @ctx: buffer to receive the result
> + * @size: available size in, actual size out
> + * @flags: unused
> + *
> + * Fill the passed user space @ctx with the details of the requested
> + * attribute.
> + *
> + * Returns 1, the number of attributes, on success, an error code otherwise.
> + */
> +static int smack_getselfattr(unsigned int __user attr,
> +			     struct lsm_ctx __user *ctx, size_t *size,
> +			     u32 __user flags)
> +{
> +	struct smack_known *skp = smk_of_current();
> +	int total;
> +	int slen;
> +	int rc = 1;
> +
> +	if (attr != LSM_ATTR_CURRENT)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	slen = strlen(skp->smk_known) + 1;
> +	total = ALIGN(slen + sizeof(*ctx), 8);
> +	if (total > *size)
> +		rc = -E2BIG;
> +	else
> +		lsm_fill_user_ctx(ctx, skp->smk_known, slen, LSM_ID_SMACK, 0);
> +
> +	*size = total;
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * smack_getprocattr - Smack process attribute access
>   * @p: the object task
> @@ -3581,8 +3616,8 @@ static int smack_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, const char *name, char **val
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * smack_setprocattr - Smack process attribute setting
> - * @name: the name of the attribute in /proc/.../attr
> + * do_setattr - Smack process attribute setting
> + * @attr: the ID of the attribute
>   * @value: the value to set
>   * @size: the size of the value
>   *
> @@ -3591,7 +3626,7 @@ static int smack_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, const char *name, char **val
>   *
>   * Returns the length of the smack label or an error code
>   */
> -static int smack_setprocattr(const char *name, void *value, size_t size)
> +static int do_setattr(u64 attr, void *value, size_t size)
>  {
>  	struct task_smack *tsp = smack_cred(current_cred());
>  	struct cred *new;
> @@ -3605,8 +3640,8 @@ static int smack_setprocattr(const char *name, void *value, size_t size)
>  	if (value == NULL || size == 0 || size >= SMK_LONGLABEL)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (strcmp(name, "current") != 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (attr != LSM_ATTR_CURRENT)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	skp = smk_import_entry(value, size);
>  	if (IS_ERR(skp))
> @@ -3645,6 +3680,64 @@ static int smack_setprocattr(const char *name, void *value, size_t size)
>  	return size;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * smack_setselfattr - Set a Smack process attribute
> + * @attr: which attribute to set
> + * @ctx: buffer containing the data
> + * @size: size of @ctx
> + * @flags: unused
> + *
> + * Fill the passed user space @ctx with the details of the requested
> + * attribute.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, an error code otherwise.
> + */
> +static int smack_setselfattr(unsigned int __user attr,
> +			     struct lsm_ctx __user *ctx, size_t __user size,

"size_t __user" isn't valid: it's not a pointer.

> +			     u32 __user flags)
> +{
> +	struct lsm_ctx *lctx;
> +	void *context;

Why is "context" used here at all? Can't this entirely be lctx?

> +	int rc;
> +
> +	context = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (context == NULL)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	lctx = (struct lsm_ctx *)context;
> +	if (copy_from_user(context, ctx, size))
> +		rc = -EFAULT;
> +	else if (lctx->ctx_len > size)
> +		rc = -EINVAL;
> +	else
> +		rc = do_setattr(attr, lctx + 1, lctx->ctx_len);

There is no "second lctx", please pass lctx->ctx instead.

> +
> +	kfree(context);
> +	if (rc > 0)
> +		return 0;
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * smack_setprocattr - Smack process attribute setting
> + * @name: the name of the attribute in /proc/.../attr
> + * @value: the value to set
> + * @size: the size of the value
> + *
> + * Sets the Smack value of the task. Only setting self
> + * is permitted and only with privilege
> + *
> + * Returns the length of the smack label or an error code
> + */
> +static int smack_setprocattr(const char *name, void *value, size_t size)
> +{
> +	int attr = lsm_name_to_attr(name);
> +
> +	if (attr)
> +		return do_setattr(attr, value, size);
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * smack_unix_stream_connect - Smack access on UDS
>   * @sock: one sock
> @@ -4955,6 +5048,8 @@ static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
>  
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(d_instantiate, smack_d_instantiate),
>  
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(getselfattr, smack_getselfattr),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(setselfattr, smack_setselfattr),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(getprocattr, smack_getprocattr),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(setprocattr, smack_setprocattr),
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-21 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230421174259.2458-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH v9 00/11] LSM: Three basic syscalls Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 01/11] LSM: Identify modules by more than name Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 19:14     ` Kees Cook
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 02/11] LSM: Maintain a table of LSM attribute data Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 19:20     ` Kees Cook
2023-04-27 15:31       ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-23  8:04     ` kernel test robot
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 03/11] proc: Use lsmids instead of lsm names for attrs Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 19:21     ` Kees Cook
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 04/11] LSM: syscalls for current process attributes Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 19:36     ` Kees Cook
2023-04-26  1:12       ` Casey Schaufler
2023-04-22 13:12     ` kernel test robot
2023-04-22 16:59     ` kernel test robot
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 05/11] LSM: Create lsm_list_modules system call Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 19:38     ` Kees Cook
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 06/11] LSM: wireup Linux Security Module syscalls Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 19:38     ` Kees Cook
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 07/11] LSM: Helpers for attribute names and filling an lsm_ctx Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 19:46     ` Kees Cook
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 08/11] Smack: implement setselfattr and getselfattr hooks Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 19:49     ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 09/11] AppArmor: Add selfattr hooks Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 19:54     ` Kees Cook
2023-04-22  1:23     ` kernel test robot
2023-04-22 14:55     ` kernel test robot
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 10/11] SELinux: " Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 19:57     ` Kees Cook
2023-04-21 17:42   ` [PATCH v9 11/11] LSM: selftests for Linux Security Module syscalls Casey Schaufler
2023-04-21 20:01     ` Kees Cook
2023-04-27 16:00       ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6442e8d3.650a0220.f3e8d.6a3f@mx.google.com \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).