From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] mm: Introduce wrappers to access mm->nr_ptes Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 16:10:31 -0700 Message-ID: <7e476fd2-5818-c395-cdf2-00b5229c1a73@intel.com> References: <20171005101442.49555-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171005101442.49555-1-kirill.shutemov-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Michal Hocko List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 10/05/2017 03:14 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/hugetlbpage.c > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void hugetlb_free_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pmd_t *pmd, > > pmd_clear(pmd); > pte_free_tlb(tlb, token, addr); > - atomic_long_dec(&tlb->mm->nr_ptes); > + mm_dec_nr_ptes(tlb->mm); > } If we're going to go replace all of these, I wonder if we should start doing it more generically. mm_dec_nr_pgtable(PGTABLE_PTE, tlb->mm) or even: mm_dec_nr_pgtable(PGTABLE_LEVEL1, tlb->mm) Instead of having a separate batch of functions for each level.