From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Pekka Enberg" Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] Add /proc/mempool to display mempool usage Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:02:09 +0200 Message-ID: <84144f020812011402v3cb3ab24pf5cb6310f2d00c5b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1227980689.6354.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081129214207.GA6747@x200.localdomain> <20081129234907.GA2340@kroah.com> <20081201101245.0a2f3123.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <1228158811.3196.88.camel@calx> <20081201120210.1ed16bd5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <84144f020812011207q29fe4b3fq11a9e55f171cf743@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , Matt Mackall , randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, greg-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, remi.colinet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> Hmm, I thought Documentation/ABI/ was supposed to tell us what's an >> ABI you can depend on and what's not. I mean, you shouldn't be >> depending on anything but the interfaces documented in >> Documentation/ABI/stable/, no? On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Who is the f*cking MORON that thinks that "documentation" has any meaning > what-so-ever? Me, I suppose. At least that's the impression I got when being asked to document any new kmemtrace debugfs files, for example. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > The fact that something is documented (whether correctly or not) has > absolutely _zero_ impact on anything at all. What makes something an ABI > is that it's useful and available. The only way something isn't an ABI is > by _explicitly_ making sure that it's not available even by mistake in a > stable form for binary use. OK, but why do we have those different ABI "stages" in Documentation/ABI then? The README file there seems to contradict what you say. Or maybe I'm reading it wrong... Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html