From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.codeweavers.com (mail.codeweavers.com [4.36.192.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F13CD1D8DFE; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 21:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=4.36.192.163 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736284268; cv=none; b=O6xw7UvnNF/fzyVovrxqc8NJuL204qmdXrcczobdJKZp4aprpw1t1kmKyGakReAP+f89fbjUICEyY1lJdPvPVK1eAFMulNjP1avVzujnPDhEB5KOexCglSoJAlborayM6/+9/bUzBhFzDARktz6UDFmKpDW7Ab1/rXO0rIMfjgU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736284268; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WfcEzCEVu4DeR2h92Sq0A6eiH0nM6HU/BvVWJyg9gfo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VBVSfLMYv0nATLxP1uet6lqpAyLDAL3Mkm6Fr1Jj5+musqp2jvujzlU03oyjxTm9HMFh/591kGDvNs1Jn8YaIeSKpTLYGWSVjgsxtVCW93rQ576GQp3QmlGZMVkhBCkqDGfdVkcwRLwyQEqfvIEVpLvduD33Oxe3v7DJzhbQN0k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeweavers.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codeweavers.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codeweavers.com header.i=@codeweavers.com header.b=Uf5NZX7/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=4.36.192.163 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeweavers.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codeweavers.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codeweavers.com header.i=@codeweavers.com header.b="Uf5NZX7/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codeweavers.com; s=s1; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Lndng4N3lO1ivo9syb5BDhuB4i7UvrhyhygqCR2rS2A=; b=Uf5NZX7/Mi4QtnsOxAyrXmNQtL aBFequoaRBP0u5aZt0Wr4/ZomaFQPqmGRxRW6Ufhhjy05EKZewosHc37L21+tjm2XpZZEc11O5ehB 59JUaRVcOjS9kPlcSnSaEefCn6HTwEn1wjUvrVIPVIqbspfEQ32SnQRqaH+hKROfuhVuCmixgSOwR ZDHgysSKj8SkDWZki+r7vXFmXRubzkP0dxVAOmD8emXYof2O3ozJXmcXPc22uA2tSpDBBjIKiqGE6 JyKezXKbRuDLDAAnTvFGyLDm9v4NjFueZNnCjKf/XG6cMPO8y+IrRjGNGoMbvIBoSknOuf0vMmUSt DEQpShAA==; Received: from cw137ip160.mn.codeweavers.com ([10.69.137.160] helo=camazotz.localnet) by mail.codeweavers.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tVGqe-008hkY-3C; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:10:53 -0600 From: Elizabeth Figura To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Almeida , Wolfram Sang , Arkadiusz Hiler , Andy Lutomirski , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/30] NT synchronization primitive driver Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:10:48 -0600 Message-ID: <8516093.NyiUUSuA9g@camazotz> In-Reply-To: <20250107194241.GC28303@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20241213193511.457338-1-zfigura@codeweavers.com> <2025010738-amicably-art-f746@gregkh> <20250107194241.GC28303@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 13:42:41 CST Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 06:06:03PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Given a lack of complaints, I've now applied this to my testing tree. > > Thanks for sticking with it! > > Right, so I acked v6, which wasn't preserved. The v7 changes are minor > and seem fine (IIRc I even suggested them some very very long time ago). I wasn't sure it was fine to preserve the ack across changes (even if they were the ones you suggested) and decided to err on the safe side. Thank you for the review!