From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] uapi/auxvec: Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 aux vector, entries
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:49:59 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edddp48o.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a50cf258-b861-40e5-8ca9-dec7721400ec@linux.ibm.com>
Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> On 2/15/24 2:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, at 23:34, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>> The powerpc toolchain keeps a copy of the HWCAP bit masks in our TCB for fast
>>> access by the __builtin_cpu_supports built-in function. The TCB space for
>>> the HWCAP entries - which are created in pairs - is an ABI extension, so
>>> waiting to create the space for HWCAP3 and HWCAP4 until we need them is
>>> problematical. Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 in the generic uapi header
>>> so they can be used in glibc to reserve space in the powerpc TCB for their
>>> future use.
>>>
>>> I scanned through the Linux and GLIBC source codes looking for unused AT_*
>>> values and 29 and 30 did not seem to be used, so they are what I went
>>> with. This has received Acked-by's from both GLIBC and Linux kernel
>>> developers and no reservations or Nacks from anyone.
>>>
>>> Arnd, we seem to have consensus on the patch below. Is this something
>>> you could take and apply to your tree?
>>>
>>
>> I don't mind taking it, but it may be better to use the
>> powerpc tree if that is where it's actually being used.
>
> So this is not a powerpc only patch, but we may be the first arch
> to use it. Szabolcs mentioned that aarch64 was pretty quickly filling
> up their AT_HWCAP2 and that they will eventually require using AT_HWCAP3
> as well. If you still think this should go through the powerpc tree,
> I can check on that.
I'm happy to take it with Arnd's ack.
I trimmed up the commit message a bit, see below.
cheers
Author: Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Wed Feb 14 16:34:06 2024 -0600
Commit: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
CommitDate: Fri Feb 16 12:42:59 2024 +1100
uapi/auxvec: Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 aux vector, entries
The powerpc toolchain keeps a copy of the HWCAP bit masks in the TCB
for fast access by the __builtin_cpu_supports() built-in function. The
TCB space for the HWCAP entries - which are created in pairs - is an ABI
extension, so waiting to create the space for HWCAP3 and HWCAP4 until
they are needed is problematic. Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 in the
generic uapi header so they can be used in glibc to reserve space in the
powerpc TCB for their future use.
I scanned through the Linux and GLIBC source codes looking for unused
AT_* values and 29 and 30 did not seem to be used, so they are what I
went with.
Signed-off-by: Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/a406b535-dc55-4856-8ae9-5a063644a1af@linux.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-14 22:34 [PATCH v2] uapi/auxvec: Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 aux vector, entries Peter Bergner
2024-02-15 8:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-15 14:39 ` Peter Bergner
2024-02-16 1:49 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2024-02-16 4:13 ` Peter Bergner
2024-02-20 12:53 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edddp48o.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).